2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of material removal in orthogonal cutting of cortical bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7(a), 8(a), 9(a) and 10(a). This conclusion agreed with the results reported in literatures [8,10]. However, the morphologies of chip curls at the same depth of cut showed the difference when the cutting angle was changed; it was caused by the difference of fracture strains due to the anisotropy of bone materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7(a), 8(a), 9(a) and 10(a). This conclusion agreed with the results reported in literatures [8,10]. However, the morphologies of chip curls at the same depth of cut showed the difference when the cutting angle was changed; it was caused by the difference of fracture strains due to the anisotropy of bone materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…When the depth of cut was increased to 50 μm, the serrated chip indicated that the material was removed by shearing. This result agreed well with the conclusion in [8,10] that the serrated chip happened when the depth of the cut was in the range of (20 μm to 60 μm). Based on the experiments and theoretical models, shearing became the predominate material removal mechanism when the depth of cut was set in this range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations