1982
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(82)90157-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of neomycin stimulation of d-glucose uptake in rabbit intestinal brush border membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study by Lemaire et al (1982) using membrane vesicles prepared from rabbit intestine concluded that the polycationic nature of neomycin was responsible for the increased hexose uptake which they observed. It was suggested by Lemaire et al (1982) that screening of membrane negative charges by the positively charged neomycin causes an accumulation of anions at the membrane surface resulting in an increase in the transmembrane potential difference and thus hexose uptake. However, Bieberdorf et al (1975) and Elsenhans et al (1983) proposed that cationic compounds rather than stimulating absorption actually inhibit the intestinal absorption of sugar by displacing Na+ from the transport carrier or its vicinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study by Lemaire et al (1982) using membrane vesicles prepared from rabbit intestine concluded that the polycationic nature of neomycin was responsible for the increased hexose uptake which they observed. It was suggested by Lemaire et al (1982) that screening of membrane negative charges by the positively charged neomycin causes an accumulation of anions at the membrane surface resulting in an increase in the transmembrane potential difference and thus hexose uptake. However, Bieberdorf et al (1975) and Elsenhans et al (1983) proposed that cationic compounds rather than stimulating absorption actually inhibit the intestinal absorption of sugar by displacing Na+ from the transport carrier or its vicinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The compound is likely to have an extracellular action since it is known to be only weakly absorbed by the intestinal epithelium (Feingold, 1963). A recent study by Lemaire et al (1982) using membrane vesicles prepared from rabbit intestine concluded that the polycationic nature of neomycin was responsible for the increased hexose uptake which they observed. It was suggested by Lemaire et al (1982) that screening of membrane negative charges by the positively charged neomycin causes an accumulation of anions at the membrane surface resulting in an increase in the transmembrane potential difference and thus hexose uptake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Механізм, що лежить в основі ідіопатичної (не інфекційної природи) ААД до кінця не з'ясований, зокрема не встанов-лено роль транспортерів води та електролітів епітелію товстої кишки. Крім того, дані про вплив антибіотиків на транспорт води елек-тролітів в кишечнику були отримані при безпосередньому їх додаванні в омиваючий розчин у дослідах in vitro та in situ [2][3][4][5] і не враховували системний ефект.…”
Section: вступunclassified
“…Early in-vitro studies suggested that neomycin could stimulate the uptake of D-glucose by rabbit small intestinal brush-border membranes because of the positively charged nature of the antibiotic molecule (Lemaire et al 1982). In contrast, candicidin, a polyene antibiotic, reduced glucose transport by rat small intestinal epithelium because of increased Na+ movement across the apical membrane producing a decrease in its electrochemical gradient (Roschina et al 1980).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%