2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Paradoxical Ventricular Septal Motion After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the motion of lateral mitral, IVS and lateral tricuspid at annulus, paradoxical motion of IVS was found in Group I and obviously enhanced to make up RV dysfunction. This conclusion was confirmed by other researchers [23,24]. Therefore patients with RV dysfunction could maintain hemodynamic stability before CABG surgery because of the compensation of IVS motion enhancement.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Comparing the motion of lateral mitral, IVS and lateral tricuspid at annulus, paradoxical motion of IVS was found in Group I and obviously enhanced to make up RV dysfunction. This conclusion was confirmed by other researchers [23,24]. Therefore patients with RV dysfunction could maintain hemodynamic stability before CABG surgery because of the compensation of IVS motion enhancement.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…No convincing explanation as to why the septum reverses after bypass surgery has yet been established. Our data suggest that the reversed septal motion is likely a compensatory mechanism for the surgically induced fall in RV long axis function in order to maintain a normal stroke volume as we and others have shown [5][6][7]. It seems therefore that the septum does not choose to reverse but the right ventricle as a whole dictates that post operative septal behaviour.…”
Section: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…None of these potential mechanisms has proved satisfactory enough to alter clinical practice in a way that could preserve RV function. Recently similar findings were interpreted using MRI, in a group of patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery, on the basis of RV adhesions as a potential mechanism for the restricted tricuspid annular motion and disturbed RV long axis function [5]. On the other hand, other studies have shown recovery of RV function after cardiopulmonary by-pass technique [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The pathogenesis of such event is disputed and several hypotheses have been suggested, including type of cardioplegia [7], myocardial hypothermia [8], cardiopulmonary bypass [9], pericardial adhesions [10], and the simple opening of the pericardium [11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%