2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2018.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of pore wetting in membrane distillation with alcohol vs. surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surfactants are amphiphilic compounds that can lower the feed solution surface tension, thereby allowing the passage of liquid water with its dissolved salts within the membrane pores 30,31 . In such a case, the wetting kinetics is controlled by the rate at which the pore surface is saturated by the adsorbed surfactant molecules 24 . Once the membrane is wetted, the MD process is no longer governed by the trans-membrane vapor tension difference but is instead controlled by the hydraulic pressures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surfactants are amphiphilic compounds that can lower the feed solution surface tension, thereby allowing the passage of liquid water with its dissolved salts within the membrane pores 30,31 . In such a case, the wetting kinetics is controlled by the rate at which the pore surface is saturated by the adsorbed surfactant molecules 24 . Once the membrane is wetted, the MD process is no longer governed by the trans-membrane vapor tension difference but is instead controlled by the hydraulic pressures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane wetting can be described as the progressive loss of hydrophobicity caused by compounds able to decrease the surface tension 23 , such as organics (especially those with amphiphilic nature) and salt crystals. While these phenomena have been observed in many studies, the literature comprises contradictory reports concerning the extent and the mechanism of wetting, as well as the onset and consequences of scaling 24,25 . Few MD experiments have been performed thus far with the complex mixture that characterizes produced water streams, and few as well had the aim of achieving high water recovery rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the fact that there was no wetting by CaSO 4 scaling without SDS, the results can be interpreted that SDS induced wetting. It seems that the reduction in the hydrophobicity by SDS led to the penetration of feed water into some pores (partial wetting) [25]. Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Sds On Wetting and Fouling By Inorganic And/or Orgmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Membrane wetting is generally observed during the long-term operation of the MD process [24]. Factors affecting membrane wetting include transmembrane pressure, capillary condensation, scale deposition (inorganic fouling), organic fouling, surfactants, and membrane degradation [8,19,23,25]. The membrane wetting reduces the quality of product water and changes the flux through the membrane [21,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 However, the pore wetting in largepore-size membranes results in the penetration of saline water and the consequent failure of MD operation. [21][22][23] As a result, the pore size of most MD membranes reported in literatures was limited to 0.2 and 0.45 mm. 12,24,25 Membrane orientation was reported to signicantly impact the water ux and salt rejection of asymmetric MD membranes due to the wetting of relatively large pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%