“…Consequently, the DFT+ U method, equivalent to the static limit of the DMFT scheme, is more appropriate for strongly correlated systems with static spin and orbital correlations, e.g., Mott insulators with large bandwidths. , In addition, DFT-based methods, in the essence of 0 K ground-state theories, fail to simultaneously capture the excitation spectra at finite temperatures, as well as the screening and relaxation features, e.g., the lower Hubbard band (LHB) and upper Hubbard band (UHB) in the photoemission spectra (PES) . Fortunately, the recently introduced DMFT scheme could deal with the low-lying coherent and high-lying incoherent excitations on the same footing, and this picture is in favor of describing the finite temperature properties of correlated systems. ,,, For CmCl 3 in this work, as illustrated in Figure a,b, the DFT+DMFT calculation captures not only the intersite quantum fluctuations but also the local ones, e.g., the quasiparticle multiplets close to the Fermi level and Hubbard bands. , …”