1978
DOI: 10.1021/bi00617a024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of the membrane potential sensitivity of the fluorescent membrane probe merocyanine 540

Abstract: The fluorescence and optical absorption of the membrane-staining dye merocyanine 540 (M-540) have been widely used to measure cellular transmembrane potentials. We have studied the molecular mechanisms of these optical changes by measuring the fluorescence polarization of M-540 and its response to membrane potential changes in hemispherical lipid bilayer membranes. The fluorescence responds to a potential step in two distinct time scales: a fast response with a rise time less than the instrumental capability o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

11
128
0
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
11
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ANS binding to stimulated lymphocytes is markedly different from binding to unstimulated lymphocytes (1); it is unclear how much of the difference is due to differences in membrane potential between stimulated and unstimulated cells. Merocyanine 540 stains marrow cells but not peripheral blood lymphocytes (66); again, the change in the fluorescence of this dye in response to nerve action potentials, which results from changes in orientation and distribution of dye in the membrane (18), is minuscule (about one part in lo3), and one would not expect to be able to detect such changes in even the most precise of today's flow cytometers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANS binding to stimulated lymphocytes is markedly different from binding to unstimulated lymphocytes (1); it is unclear how much of the difference is due to differences in membrane potential between stimulated and unstimulated cells. Merocyanine 540 stains marrow cells but not peripheral blood lymphocytes (66); again, the change in the fluorescence of this dye in response to nerve action potentials, which results from changes in orientation and distribution of dye in the membrane (18), is minuscule (about one part in lo3), and one would not expect to be able to detect such changes in even the most precise of today's flow cytometers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] VSDs have been useful optical indicators for membrane potential measurements in cells and organelles that are too small for electrodes. [14] VSDs are generally categorized by their response to the change in local electric field, and one distinguishes fast-response and slow-response probes. [15] Most slow-response VSDs exhibit polarity-dependent optical characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] Here we compare the voltage sensitivity of the SHG from JR1 with that from three widely studied styryl dyes (FM4-64, di-4-ANEPPS, and RH237) in hemispherical lipid bilayers (HLBs). [15,26,27] The results show that the SHG signal from the porphyrin-based dye is exceptionally sensitive to an electric field.The sensitivity of the porphyrin dye JR1 and the styryl dyes FM4-64, di-4-ANEPPS, and RH237 to transmembrane potential was investigated using the setup shown in Figure 1. [15,26,27] Each dye was added to an aqueous solution of phosphate buffered saline to give a dye concentration of 5 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15,26,27] The results show that the SHG signal from the porphyrin-based dye is exceptionally sensitive to an electric field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation