1981
DOI: 10.1021/j150616a013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of the ozone-ethene reaction in dilute N2/O2 mixtures near 1-atm pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
54
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values obtained at room temperature and atmospheric pressure by Su et al (1980) Kan et al (1981) (37±2%), Niki et al (1981) (35±5%), ) (39.0±5.3%) and (39±11%) are in good agreement (with an average yield of 37%) and are preferred to the slightly higher value of 47% obtained by . The yield of stabilized Criegee intermediate appears to be pressure dependent although a significant fraction have been reported to be formed thermally "cold" at low pressures; by extrapolation of measurements over the range 13 mbar to 1.5 bar, found this fraction to be 20±3% at zero pressure.…”
Section: Comments On Preferred Valuesmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The values obtained at room temperature and atmospheric pressure by Su et al (1980) Kan et al (1981) (37±2%), Niki et al (1981) (35±5%), ) (39.0±5.3%) and (39±11%) are in good agreement (with an average yield of 37%) and are preferred to the slightly higher value of 47% obtained by . The yield of stabilized Criegee intermediate appears to be pressure dependent although a significant fraction have been reported to be formed thermally "cold" at low pressures; by extrapolation of measurements over the range 13 mbar to 1.5 bar, found this fraction to be 20±3% at zero pressure.…”
Section: Comments On Preferred Valuesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…These two studies result in rate coefficients (Bahta et al, 1984; which are somewhat lower than many of the previous determinations, including those of Su et al (1980) and Kan et al (1981) which are not used in this evaluation. Since did not tabulate the individual rate coefficients at the various temperatures studied, only their 298 K value can be used in the evaluation of the rate coefficient for this reaction.…”
Section: Comments On Preferred Valuesmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations