2015
DOI: 10.1021/jp512909t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of the Transfer of AuCl4 and TOA+ Ions Across the Liquid/Liquid Interface

Abstract: The Brust−Schiffrin (BS) two-phase method to synthesize nanoparticles has been widely used. In this method, the transfer of tetrachloroaurate (AuCl 4 − ) from aqueous phase into organic phase is the first step. However, the mechanism of the transfer of AuCl 4 − is still not clear. In this paper, we studied the mechanism of the transfer of AuCl 4 − across a micrometer-sized interface between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES). Our results revealed that the presence of TOA + can enhance the transfer of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the HCl byproduct transfers from DCE to water; the dissociation constant of the acid in the organic phase can explain the lack of observed ion transfer current. We note that Duong et al have also studied this process using octanethiol as the reducing agent . They saw only a small change in the [AuCl 4 ] − transfer current, although the thiol was added to the aqueous phase and the time-scale of the reaction with thiol was not clear.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, the HCl byproduct transfers from DCE to water; the dissociation constant of the acid in the organic phase can explain the lack of observed ion transfer current. We note that Duong et al have also studied this process using octanethiol as the reducing agent . They saw only a small change in the [AuCl 4 ] − transfer current, although the thiol was added to the aqueous phase and the time-scale of the reaction with thiol was not clear.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This phase boundary potential prevents the loss of Au-containing ionic species into the aqueous phase because it is below that required for Au ion transfer. In the case of the TOA + Br – , which has also been used as a catalyst to transfer gold into the organic phase in the Brust–Schiffrin method, ion exchange proceeds as in process i though Br – is rather hydrophobic. , By contrast, TOA + and H + do not transfer between water and DCE because of their respective hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity, although a specific interaction between TOA + and [AuCl 4 ] − has recently been proposed …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In metal ion extraction, a hydrophobic ligand is typically dissolved in the organic phase and coordinates with the metal ion either interfacially or in the bulk organic/aqeuous phase [13,14]. Conventional means of separation have been through physical mixing of the two phases [9,15]; however, as previously demonstrated [10][11][12]16], this process can also be investigated electrochemically using liquid|liquid electrochemistry performed at a polarizable interface between two immiscible electrolytic solutions (ITIES) [13,14,[17][18][19][20][21]. Furthermore, in order to reduce samples sizes and improve sensitivity, a micro-ITIES is often employed, such as at the tip of a pulled borosilicate glass capillary [11,16,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a small amount of TOABr is added into the DCE phase, one can see another wave near 0.1 V (Wave B) in Figure . Our previous research shows that the presence of the hydrophilic bromide ion in the organic phase can only produce a background current and does not affect the study of the transfer of other ions . Therefore, wave B should be related to the transfer of TOA + .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%