2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c04537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanism of Thermal Charge Relaxation in Poled Silicate Glasses in a Wide Temperature Range (From Liquid Nitrogen to Glass Melting Temperature)

Abstract: Data on thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC) study of the same poled glass in the temperature range 100–1000 K are analyzed. Four specific temperature ranges in the TSDC spectrum of this glass are identified, with each range being attributed to the charge relaxation processes of different natures. During linear heating in the temperature range 100–250 K, charge relaxation is related to the adsorption/desorption of particles from the atmosphere, supposedly water cluster ions H+(H2O) n . The next T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously mentioned, the contribution to conduction of Ca 2+ is very unlikely at the poling condition studied in this work. For example, several researchers have reported activation energy of ∼2 eV and peak temperature above 400°C for Ca 2+ ions diffusion in oxide glasses, hence excluding its contribution to the observed low temperature relaxation mechanism 8,59,60 . Therefore, long‐range motion of Na + ions is the dominant contribution of P1, and the values of activation energy are found to be in good agreement with the values reported by several researchers 61,62 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As previously mentioned, the contribution to conduction of Ca 2+ is very unlikely at the poling condition studied in this work. For example, several researchers have reported activation energy of ∼2 eV and peak temperature above 400°C for Ca 2+ ions diffusion in oxide glasses, hence excluding its contribution to the observed low temperature relaxation mechanism 8,59,60 . Therefore, long‐range motion of Na + ions is the dominant contribution of P1, and the values of activation energy are found to be in good agreement with the values reported by several researchers 61,62 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, several researchers have reported activation energy of ∼2 eV and peak temperature above 400 • C for Ca 2+ ions diffusion in oxide glasses, hence excluding its contribution to the observed low temperature relaxation mechanism. 8,59,60 Therefore, long-range motion of Na + ions is the dominant contribution of P1, and the values of activation energy are found to be in good agreement with the values reported by several researchers. 61,62 In poled SLS, the relaxation peak P1 is followed by a prominent drop in current at higher temperatures also known as high-temperature background (HTB).…”
Section: Conventional Tsdcsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A secondary heat‐treatment can lead to depoling processes in which cations drift back into the depletion layer under the force of the “frozen” electric field or diffuse due to chemical gradients 19–21 . As an example, the depoling current (as shown in Figure 4) was measured for TP0.9‐GC1 770 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary heat-treatment can lead to depoling processes in which cations drift back into the depletion layer under the force of the "frozen" electric field or diffuse due to chemical gradients. [19][20][21] As an example, the depoling current (as shown in Figure 4) was measured for TP0.9-GC1 770 . For the measurement, Pt metal sheets were used as electrodes instead of graphite due to the required temperature stability.…”
Section: Depoling During the Crystallization Heat-treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the interaction mechanism of interface have a very important impact on the explanation of properties of nanocomposites. However, most studies only investigated the charge transport behavior at the interface in bulk materials through several techniques at the macro scale, such as thermal stimulation current (TSDC), broad band dielectric spectroscopy measurement, and pulsed electro-acoustic measurement [28][29][30]. Generally, the chemical and physical interfacial area between the polymer matrix and the filler is often only tens of nanometers to several micrometers [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%