1995
DOI: 10.1021/bk-1995-0602.ch023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and Consequences of Protein Adsorption on Soil Mineral Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
37
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Adsorption would physically separate DNA and the nuclease on the clay surface. This statement is in agreement with the fact that bound enzymes usually exhibit reduced activity (5,11,13,24,29,32). Furthermore, the lower level of protection found with illite compared to kaolinite and montmorillonite could be due to the higher affinity of DNase I for the two other clay minerals as we have observed recently (unpublished results).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adsorption would physically separate DNA and the nuclease on the clay surface. This statement is in agreement with the fact that bound enzymes usually exhibit reduced activity (5,11,13,24,29,32). Furthermore, the lower level of protection found with illite compared to kaolinite and montmorillonite could be due to the higher affinity of DNase I for the two other clay minerals as we have observed recently (unpublished results).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For instance, does adsorption physically prevent DNA from being attacked by nucleases? Or is protection related to adsorption of enzymes on clay, which induces conformation alterations leading to a decrease in activity (11,17,24,33,34)? Moreover, how is the remaining clay-adsorbed DNA available for bacterial transformation, and what are the consequences of a partial protection on the transformation efficiency?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis also demonstrates that over the entire pD range investigated adsorption of ␣-chymotrypsin on montmorillonite is mainly determined by electrostatic interactions (6,13,16,26,27,29). When the protein and the clay are brought into contact, these interactions result in a dynamic structural transition of the protein which can last up to 1 h. In the 4.5-9 pD range, the unfolding resulting from the adsorption involves about 15-20 peptide units in peripheral ␤-sheets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…79 Maximum adsorption near the IEP has been shown for many other proteins and surfaces. 98 Because the N-terminal domain is known to be flexibly-disordered and contains a high number of positively-charged amino acids, it may play a significant role in electrostatic attraction to negatively-charged mineral surfaces. 70 The N-terminal domain is lost upon desorption of PrP Sc from clay, 68 and PK-digestion is required to desorb maximal PrP Sc from clay and sandy soils.…”
Section: Routes Of Entry Occurrence and Detection In The Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%