2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and modeling of subsurface fatigue cracking in metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should be due to the physical mechanism of FGA formation. Even if there is not a unique mechanism accepted in the VHCF community, all the authors agree that FGA formation needs time because either dislocations accumulation around inclusion to produce grain refinement or severe plastic flow at the inclusion assisted or not by cyclic pressing needs many cycles under very low stress or strain amplitudes. Then, when the nano‐grain area around the inclusion is large enough, the stress intensity factor range exceeds its threshold value and the crack propagates.…”
Section: Effect Of Microstructural and Mechanical Features On The Vhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should be due to the physical mechanism of FGA formation. Even if there is not a unique mechanism accepted in the VHCF community, all the authors agree that FGA formation needs time because either dislocations accumulation around inclusion to produce grain refinement or severe plastic flow at the inclusion assisted or not by cyclic pressing needs many cycles under very low stress or strain amplitudes. Then, when the nano‐grain area around the inclusion is large enough, the stress intensity factor range exceeds its threshold value and the crack propagates.…”
Section: Effect Of Microstructural and Mechanical Features On The Vhcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Because nonmetallic inclusions are the crack origins for most VHCF cases with interior crack initiation, the effects of the inclusions on the behavior of VHCF have been intensively investigated, and the influential parameters are their size, elastic properties, and adhesion to the matrix. 23 Each of these proposed mechanisms encountered difficulties for more general cases. 17 Several models have been proposed to explain the formation mechanism of FGA, including "hydrogen assisted crack growth", 19,20 "decohesion of spherical carbide", 8 "formation and debonding of fine granular layer", 4,21 "local grain refinement at crack tip and debonding", 22 and "vortical plastic flows to produce nanostructure layer and debonding".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Thus, it received a number of investigations with different explanations for its formation mechanism, including 'hydrogen assisted crack growth', 31,32 'decohesion of spherical carbides', 33 'formation and debonding of fine granular layer', 27,34 'local grain refinement at crack tip and debonding', 35 and 'vortical plastic flows to produce nanostructure layer and debonding'. 36 These proposed mechanisms encountered difficulties in the explanation of different experimental cases including a recent result 37 for a martensitic 12% Cr steel, for which the morphology of FGA was observed in the specimens at R = À1 but never found in the specimens fatigued at R = 0.1, 0.5 and 0.7. Recently, it was revealed that this characteristic region of FGA is a nanograin (NG) layer of several hundred nanometer thick on both crack surfaces for the cases of negative stress ratios, while the NG layer diminishes for the cases of positive stress ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%