1994
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1041053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and Pathophysiology of Mild Head Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
45
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Babbs By means of neuropsychological tests they arrived at conclusion that heading does not have any influence on worsening these functions. These result, however, differ from neuropsychicologocal literature which states that repeated minor head injuries results in structural damage, tracable in neuropsychic tests (Elson & Ward 1994;Goodman, 1994).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Babbs By means of neuropsychological tests they arrived at conclusion that heading does not have any influence on worsening these functions. These result, however, differ from neuropsychicologocal literature which states that repeated minor head injuries results in structural damage, tracable in neuropsychic tests (Elson & Ward 1994;Goodman, 1994).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Symptoms of mild traumatic brain injury fade away quickly in most cases, nevertheless, long-term repetitive strain may induce permanent health problems (Gronwall & Wrightson, 1975;Rieder & Jansen, 2011). Neuropsychological literature puts it that permanent mild head injury results in a structural damage that can be detected via neuropsychological tests (Elson & Ward 1994;Goodman, 1994). Rutherford et al (2003) mention two causes of cumulative injuries in football.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that NSE is also present in red blood cells and platelets and any elevation may have a possible extracranial source of release [14]. One other issue with this biomarker is the difficulty in defining the optimal point of time for taking NSE measurements since the biological half-life is more than 20 h. This slow elimination makes an assessment of the amount of primary damage difficult to ascertain, and one cannot distinguish between primary injury and secondary injuries [13,14]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomarker needs to give the most accurate data on the extent of the injury, its timing and the identification of its most likely outcome. Many early studies included serum measurements of different enzymes such as glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase, lactic dehydrogenase and others [13,14,15]. These early reports looking for biomarkers demonstrated an increased enzyme activity in serum in many head-injured patients, but, as expected, their specificity for brain injury was insufficient.…”
Section: Characterization Of An Ideal Biochemical Markermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, many investigators of the early 1990s were of the belief that concussion of the brain could occur without evidence of cellular or vascular lesions of the cerebrum, and a number of studies were cited by Denny and Russel [7,8,13]. Others found areas of petechiae, in the absence of other lesions, after fatal brain injury [13]. In 1943, Holbourn stated that the relative motion between brain constituents is insignificant in linear acceleration, but not so in angular acceleration [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%