2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and pathophysiology of the low-level blast brain injury in animal models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animals exposed to howitzer blasts at 30 kPa although displayed parenchymal and subarachnoid hemorrhages, they were not significantly different from that of controls due to the limitations in the number of animals. Säljö et al concluded that low levels of blast causes brain edema as indicated by increased bioelectric impedance, an increase in intracranial pressure, small brain hemorrhages and impaired cognitive function [49]. In our study the animals were exposed to higher open field blast pressure than these animals and the likelihood of such hemorrhages although possible was not investigated as the focus was to study neuronal injury and glial reactivity changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Animals exposed to howitzer blasts at 30 kPa although displayed parenchymal and subarachnoid hemorrhages, they were not significantly different from that of controls due to the limitations in the number of animals. Säljö et al concluded that low levels of blast causes brain edema as indicated by increased bioelectric impedance, an increase in intracranial pressure, small brain hemorrhages and impaired cognitive function [49]. In our study the animals were exposed to higher open field blast pressure than these animals and the likelihood of such hemorrhages although possible was not investigated as the focus was to study neuronal injury and glial reactivity changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Time-course of ICP changes in groups of rats exposed to low-level blasts were reported by Saljo et al [22]. Under low levels of single blast exposure, ICP showed a slow-rising, sustained increase to a maximum level, following which it gradually declined to the normal levels [22]. Saljo et al reported a dependence of increase in ICP (peak and delay in elevation) on the intensity of blast when rats were exposed to a single blast of 10, 30, and 60 kPa [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Interestingly the transient increase in ICP during exposure to a blast wave (138 kPa) generated in shock tube had a higher magnitude than the blast wave itself [19]. Time-course of ICP changes in groups of rats exposed to low-level blasts were reported by Saljo et al [22]. Under low levels of single blast exposure, ICP showed a slow-rising, sustained increase to a maximum level, following which it gradually declined to the normal levels [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various species have been examined including: rodents (Kaur et al, 1995, 1997), nonhuman primates (Lu et al, 2012), and pigs (Bauman et al, 2009; de Lanerolle et al, 2011). To complement these efforts, in-laboratory blast testing has been performed using shock tubes, which are typically cylindrical tubes where rats (Cernak et al, 2001a, b; Saljo et al, 2001, 2002a, b, 2011; Long et al, 2009; Readnower et al, 2010; Cullen et al, 2011; Garman et al, 2011; Park et al, 2011), mice (Cernak et al, 2011; Koliatsos et al, 2011), and ferrets (Rafaels et al, 2012) have been exposed to blast-like pressure wave propagation driven by compressed gas (e.g., air, nitrogen, helium). Other studies have employed explosive charge-driven shock tubes (Saljo et al, 2000; Reneer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Animal Model Of Blast-induced Traumatic Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%