2020
DOI: 10.5194/wcd-1-657-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms and predictability of sudden stratospheric warming in winter 2018

Abstract: Abstract. In the beginning of February 2018 a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation in the polar Northern Hemisphere stratosphere took place, and on 12 February the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60∘ N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly in a sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) event. We investigate the role of the tropospheric forcing in the occurrence of the SSW, its predictability and teleconnection with the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) by analysing the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (E… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result suggests that wave propagation conditions in the upper troposphere and the lower stratosphere, rather than tropospheric precursors, play a more important role in determining the predictability of the 2021 SSW in the ECMWF and JMA forecasts. This contrasts with previous studies that have emphasized the role of tropospheric precursors in SSW prediction (Karpechko et al., 2018; Statnaia et al., 2020; Tripathi et al., 2016). This aligns with the earlier studies showing that the enhanced wave flux in the lower stratosphere is common in successful SSW prediction (Rao et al., 2019; Taguchi, 2018), while strong heat flux in the troposphere is not always necessary for successful SSW prediction (Noguchi et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This result suggests that wave propagation conditions in the upper troposphere and the lower stratosphere, rather than tropospheric precursors, play a more important role in determining the predictability of the 2021 SSW in the ECMWF and JMA forecasts. This contrasts with previous studies that have emphasized the role of tropospheric precursors in SSW prediction (Karpechko et al., 2018; Statnaia et al., 2020; Tripathi et al., 2016). This aligns with the earlier studies showing that the enhanced wave flux in the lower stratosphere is common in successful SSW prediction (Rao et al., 2019; Taguchi, 2018), while strong heat flux in the troposphere is not always necessary for successful SSW prediction (Noguchi et al., 2016).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…It has been observed from previous studies that the MW in 2012/13, 2017/18 and 2018/19 was favoured by the easterly phase of QBO (weak polar vortex), although the phase was not easterly in 2020/21. The winters 2012/13, 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2020/21 were preceded by a neutral ENSO, La Nina, El Nino and La Nina phases, respectively, as reported in the studies of Dai and Tan [64], Statnaia et al [65], Lu et al [42] and others. The weak polar vortex in the easterly phase of QBO, and the El Nino and La Nina conditions supported the occurrence of MWs in these years.…”
Section: Eliassen Palm Flux Divergence and Wave Forcingssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Since the World Climate Research Program (WCRP) and World Weather Research Program initiated the S2S prediction project in November 2013, several extreme stratospheric polar vortex events have been observed in both the NH and SH. Specifically, two major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) were observed over the Arctic stratosphere in February 2018 (Ayarzagüena et al, 2018;Karpechko et al, 2018;Kautz et al, 2020;Statnaia et al, 2020) and January 2019 (Butler et al, 2020;, respectively. The February 2018 SSW was preceded by blocking over the Urals and Alaska in phase with the local climatological ridges, and thus amplified the climatological wavenumber 2 (Lee et al, 2019;Lü et al, 2020;Overland et al, 2020;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%