“…However, a thermal mechanism should be rejected taking into account that: (1) the distance between the antenna and the head drastically reduces the absorbed power (Schö nborn et al, 1999); (2) increase of skin temperature would be easily dissipated through the blood flow (Van Leeuwen et al, 1999); and (3) near-infrared light penetrates through the brain at least 1.5 cm in-depth, in which temperature changes are far below the danger level (Wang and Fujiwara, 1999;Bernardi et al, 2000). Thus, several nonthermal mechanisms could be involved, such as: (1) proteins conformational variations resulting in proteins functional changes; (2) modifications in the binding of ligands, such as Ca + + to cell receptors, also resulting in a changed receptor function; (3) absorption of RF energy by the vibrational states of biologic components, such as microtubules; (4) enhanced attraction amongst cells (the pearl-chain effect); and (5) demodulation of a modulated RF signal, producing extremely lowfrequency electric fields (for a review, see Challis, 2005). Given the short-term effects observed in this study as a consequence of an acute exposure lasting 40 mins, conclusions about long-term health consequences of the RF-EMF exposure are premature and need more-in-depth epidemiologic investigations, particularly regarding long-term and repeated exposures over several years.…”