Profiling Humans From Their Voice 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8403-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms for Profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of biometric data, in fact, relies on the assumption that data can disclose truths about the self (Amoore, 2020; Humphrey, 2022). This assumption is at the base of forensic practices such as voice profiling (Singh, 2019) – the possibility of recognizing people’s identity, emotions and intentions from the measurement of their voice features. These practices, increasingly common in everyday online activities, assume transparency (Amoore, 2020) as an unquestioned value and produce accountable subjects through computational regimes of visibility and intelligibility (Ajana, 2013).…”
Section: Google’s Euphonia and The Ethopolitics Of Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of biometric data, in fact, relies on the assumption that data can disclose truths about the self (Amoore, 2020; Humphrey, 2022). This assumption is at the base of forensic practices such as voice profiling (Singh, 2019) – the possibility of recognizing people’s identity, emotions and intentions from the measurement of their voice features. These practices, increasingly common in everyday online activities, assume transparency (Amoore, 2020) as an unquestioned value and produce accountable subjects through computational regimes of visibility and intelligibility (Ajana, 2013).…”
Section: Google’s Euphonia and The Ethopolitics Of Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditory nonverbal disclosures are noisy signals, and thus inferences inherently fall short of precision, both when made by humans (Juslin and Scherer 2005) and when made by algorithms (Kröger, Lutz and Raschke 2020). Yet, auditory signal analysis is a highly active field of research, in which both the scope of investigated phenomena and performance accuracy keep increasing 5 (for technical reviews of the state of the art, see, e.g., Bai et al [2020], Chaki [2021], Cummins and Schuller [2019], Schuller et al [2021], and Singh [2019]). All computational approaches referenced in Table 2 perform above chance level; in certain domains, algorithmic inferences based on auditory nonverbal disclosures are already as accurate as, and sometimes even more accurate than, human judgments (Cummins, Baird, and Schuller 2018; Kröger, Lutz, and Raschke 2020).…”
Section: Nonverbal Disclosure In Oral Versus Manual Interactions With...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working hypothesis for this paper, and one that has also recently been proposed in the context of voice profiling [ 1 ], is that if a given factor exerts an influence on the speaker, and if pathways of biological effects can be traced from that influence to the speaker’s voice production system, then voice must be affected (and must carry biomarkers for the factor). The methodology proposed herein is a literal test of this hypothesis in that it traces biological pathways from cause to effect to establish the existence of biomarkers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%