2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms for Success after Long-term Nutrient Enrichment in a Boreal Forest Understory

Abstract: Global levels of reactive nitrogen are predicted to rise in the coming decades as a result of increased deposition from the burning of fossil fuels and the large-scale conversion of nitrogen into a useable form for agriculture. Many plant communities respond strongly to increases in soil nitrogen, particularly in northern ecosystems where nitrogen levels are naturally very low. An experiment in northern Canada that was initiated in 1990 has been investigating the effects of long-term nutrient enrichment (ferti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some understory species can be particularly beneficial on reclamation sites, early successional and ruderal species often dominate restoration areas and can severely compete with the planted tree species (Macdonald et al 2015a). Generally, northern boreal forests are nutrient limited environments where nutrient amendments could favour nitrophilous grass and forb species which have rapid growth rates, large leaf areas and are significant competitors to both young trees and other native vegetation (Landhäusser and Lieffers 1998;Grainger and Turkington 2013;Hedwall et al 2013). As a result, field fertilization of boreal forest ecosystems is controversial as it can lead to a decline in plant species richness (Grainger and Turkington 2013;Gilliam 2007) and uncertain tree growth responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some understory species can be particularly beneficial on reclamation sites, early successional and ruderal species often dominate restoration areas and can severely compete with the planted tree species (Macdonald et al 2015a). Generally, northern boreal forests are nutrient limited environments where nutrient amendments could favour nitrophilous grass and forb species which have rapid growth rates, large leaf areas and are significant competitors to both young trees and other native vegetation (Landhäusser and Lieffers 1998;Grainger and Turkington 2013;Hedwall et al 2013). As a result, field fertilization of boreal forest ecosystems is controversial as it can lead to a decline in plant species richness (Grainger and Turkington 2013;Gilliam 2007) and uncertain tree growth responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a variable response to N fertilization has been observed among the grasses and herbs. Some species are favored, and other species suffer following fertilization (Turkington et al 1998), reflecting the different functional traits of the species (Grainger and Turkington 2013). The increased vascular plant cover we observed was less than the increase found after clear cutting, in response to increased nutrients and light (Palviainen et al 2005b).…”
Section: Vegetation Cover and Fertilization Intensitymentioning
confidence: 59%