There are currently 17 African countries in which animal trypanocidal drug resistance has been reported. Largescale surveys were carried out in only ten of them. The lack of baseline information is mainly due to the fact that the methods currently available for the detection of drug resistance are laborious, expensive and time consuming. In this review the mechanisms involved in resistance to isometamidium and diminazene will be discussed, together with some new molecular detection tools that have been developed recently enabling faster diagnosis of drug resistance than conventional laboratory or field tests.
African animal trypanosomiasis and drug resistanceTsetse fly-transmitted trypanosomiasis is an important constraint to livestock development in sub-Saharan Africa with estimated annual losses owing to the direct and indirect effects of the disease running into billions of dollars. Approximately 9 million km 2 of sub-Saharan Africa, representing about one-third of the total land, is affected by tsetse flies [1]. Within this region, some 46-62 million head of cattle and other livestock species are at risk of the disease [2]. Trypanosomiasis is controlled either by controlling the vector or by controlling the parasite, or a combination of both. Over the years, a large arsenal of vector-control tools has been developed. Nevertheless, the control of animal trypanosomiasis in often poor rural communities has and will continue to rely heavily on the use of trypanocidal drugs. This is not surprising considering the private nature (i.e. the easy, individual, nonconcerted use) of such treatments and the difficulties in maintaining cleared areas in the absence of barriers to re-invasion of tsetse flies. Only a small group of chemoprophylactic and chemotherapeutic trypanocidal compounds are currently in use and new compounds are unlikely to become available in the near future [3]. Geerts and Holmes [4] estimated that in Africa 35 million doses of veterinary trypanocidal drugs are administered each year with isometamidium chloride (ISM), ethidium bromide (EtBr) and diminazene aceturate (DA) estimated to represent 40%, 26% and 33%, respectively, of the total trypanocidal drug market by value [5]. ISM is mainly used as a prophylactic drug and provides on average 3 months' protection (2-22 weeks) against trypanosome infection. DA has only therapeutic properties and EtBr has limited prophylactic properties and is mainly used as a therapeutic agent [6]. Considering the well known mutagenic properties of EtBr, this drug should ideally be removed from the drug market, but in practice it is still widely used in many countries. Removing this drug from the market would not jeopardize the treatment of animal trypanosomiasis because it can be replaced either by DA for curative purposes or by ISM for prophylactic purposes. When trypanosomes are resistant to ISM, EtBr will be ineffective as cross-resistance is observed between the two drugs [7]. As a result of inappropriate trypanocidal drug-use practices, there is growing co...