1985
DOI: 10.1016/0304-419x(85)90009-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of carcinogenesis induced by alkylating agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
252
1
11

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
14
252
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection of promutagenic lesions in GI tissue DNA samples in several regions of the world now provides a possible explanation for the presence in some GI tumours of activated ras genes (Bos, 1989) which could arise as a result of miscoding events due to the presence of alkylated bases during DNA synthesis (Saffhill et al, 1985). Although from these limited studies there is no direct indication of a relationship between cancer incidence and the extent of DNA alkylation it is anticipated that as data of this kind accumulate, it will not only be possible to define exposures to environmental sources of DNA damaging agents, but eventually to determine their importance and possibly also to begin to predict risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The detection of promutagenic lesions in GI tissue DNA samples in several regions of the world now provides a possible explanation for the presence in some GI tumours of activated ras genes (Bos, 1989) which could arise as a result of miscoding events due to the presence of alkylated bases during DNA synthesis (Saffhill et al, 1985). Although from these limited studies there is no direct indication of a relationship between cancer incidence and the extent of DNA alkylation it is anticipated that as data of this kind accumulate, it will not only be possible to define exposures to environmental sources of DNA damaging agents, but eventually to determine their importance and possibly also to begin to predict risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such procedure is the use of radioimmunoassays (RIAs) to detect specific DNA lesions arising from exposure to alkylating agents. In the case of the simple alkylating agents, 13 products have been detected in DNA and of these, the promutagenic lesions 06-alkylguanine and 04-alkylthymine are thought to play a critical role in tumour initiation (Saffhill et al, 1985). A monoclonal antibody (McAb) specific for the detection of 06-methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (06-MedG) (Wild et al, 1983;Myers et al, 1988;Saffhill et al, 1988a) has been used extensively to measure relatively high concentrations of 06-MeG in small samples of DNA extracted either from cell cultures (Boyle et al, 1986(Boyle et al, , 1987 or from mitochondrial DNA (Myers et al, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biological basis of organ-specific carcinogenesis is not yet fully understood, but several factors have been implicated; including distribution of the parent carcinogen, tissue-and cell-specific bioactivation, cell turnover and DNA repair (for review see refs [14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which aliphatic /V-nitrosomethylalkylamines methylate cellular DNA in various rat tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the continued transcription and translation of the ATase results in minimal cytotoxicity at this dose. Since both ogt and ada ATases are able to repair 06-MeG at the same rate (Wilkinson et al, 1989), whereas the ogt ATase repairs 04-MeT more efficiently than the ada enzyme (Wilkinson et al, 1989), the difference between LH2 and SB cell survival may be attributed to the more efficient repair of 04-MeT by the ogt enzyme, suggesting that even though 04-MeT constitutes only 0.7% of the total alkylated bases following MNU exposure (Saffhill et al, 1985) it could be a toxic lesion. However, unequivocal determination of 04-MeT-induced toxicity cannot be established without direct measurement of the adducts.…”
Section: Functional Activity Of the Ogt A Tase In Mammalian Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%