2001
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.26749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of cell death induced by suicide genes encoding purine nucleoside phosphorylase and thymidine kinase in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…31,32 An in vitro study of the GSVtk and PNP-GDEPT systems showed that the latter produced more tumor cell apoptosis than the former, and that the induction of apoptosis by PNP/fludarabine-GDEPT was independent of p53 status and the Fas/FasL pathway. 33 LNCaP tumors express phenotypically wild-type p53 34 and this is likely to be the case for LN3 cells. PC3 cells are p53 null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…31,32 An in vitro study of the GSVtk and PNP-GDEPT systems showed that the latter produced more tumor cell apoptosis than the former, and that the induction of apoptosis by PNP/fludarabine-GDEPT was independent of p53 status and the Fas/FasL pathway. 33 LNCaP tumors express phenotypically wild-type p53 34 and this is likely to be the case for LN3 cells. PC3 cells are p53 null.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, PI staining results showed that the ePNP/MePdR system increased the spontaneous apoptosis of tumor cells (Figure 3), consistent with those results reported previously. 18 We also observed a high bystander killing effect induced by the ePNP/MePdR system, with a very low proportion (1%) of SC/ePNP-infected cells (Figure 4). The data presented here indicated that the ePNP/MePdR system could increase the spontaneous apoptosis of the tumor cells, and that its killing effect to the bystander cells was caused by a high bystander effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…[9][10][11][12][13] Therefore, expression of ePNP is able to kill a number of cancer cells in vitro when a small fraction of cells (for example, 0.1-3%) express this suicide gene, in combination with MePdR administration. 8,[14][15][16][17][18] As expression of suicide genes will not be achieved in all the tumor cells, a bystander effect is necessary to produce toxic metabolites to kill not only the positive cells but also the bystander cells. [19][20][21] The ePNP/ MePdR system differs from other GDEPT systems, because the toxic metabolites of this system will readily cross the cell membrane and not require direct cell-to-cell contact or the presence of a gap junction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Both prodrug-activating systems induce apoptosis in Transduction of PNP gene followed by treatment with nucleoside analogues has been studied in vivo on bladder tumors, pancreatic adenocarcinomas, gliomas, ovarian or prostate tumors and showed different levels of growth inhibition. 40,44,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] To increase the effect obtained with this gene-therapy approach by using new genes and new drugs, a study based on crystallographic and computer modeling of E. coli PNP, was performed.…”
Section: Gene Therapy and Nucleoside Analogues C Hébrard Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%