1973
DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(73)90061-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of chromosomal aberration production II. Aberrations induced by 5-bromodeoxyuridine and visible light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally assumed that gaps are sites of despiralisation in the metaphase chromosome, which render the DNA invisible under light microscopy. It has been proposed that an achromatic lesion may actually be a single-strand break in the DNA double helix because of incomplete excision repair and thus may represent a point of possible instability [ 28 ]. Therefore, gaps are always noted but reported separately from true chromosomal aberrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally assumed that gaps are sites of despiralisation in the metaphase chromosome, which render the DNA invisible under light microscopy. It has been proposed that an achromatic lesion may actually be a single-strand break in the DNA double helix because of incomplete excision repair and thus may represent a point of possible instability [ 28 ]. Therefore, gaps are always noted but reported separately from true chromosomal aberrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence was also provided by Brewen et al (1975) who showed that the broken chromosomes due to the mutagenic action of chemical mutagen were eventually lost at anaphase, resulting in the death of the developing embryo. Bender et al (1973Bender et al ( , 1974 proposed a model by which chromosomal aberrations could be induced by a mutagen in the germ cells. Their studies strongly supported the view that the dominant lethality was the outcome of the loss of chromosomal material by way of deletions in the chromosomes of gametes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When psoralin treated cells are exposed t6 visible light, DNA lesions, believed to be mainly interstrand crosslinks, are produced, and chromosomal aberrations result. Since the crosslinking is light-dependant, the lesion can be induced at known stages in the cell cycle in synchronized cultures, and an analysis analogous to those we performed earlier for 5-bromodeoxyuridine-plus-light-induced polynucleotide strand breaks (Bender, Bedford and Mitchell, 1973) and for ultraviolet-induced pyrimidine cyclobutane dimers (Bender, Griggs and Walker, 1973) is feasible.…”
Section: Chemical Clastogenesis Preliminary Experiments•and Observatmentioning
confidence: 98%