2012
DOI: 10.9753/icce.v33.structures.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Coastal Dike Failure Induced by the Great East Japan Earthquake Tsunami

Abstract: Based on the results of field surveys, coastal dike failures caused by the Great East Japan Earthquake were classified into eight patterns. The results of hydraulic model experiments related to major failure patterns reinforced the proposed failure processes. In addition, the aggregated length of each failure pattern showed that failure from scouring at the landward toe is the dominant failure pattern.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is also clear that 508 some important structures might have to be designed so that they fail in a non-catastrophic way. These 509 were described by Kato (2012) as "tenacious structures", representing a structure that would slowly fail 510 over the course of the event while retaining some functionality (this idea is similar to what has been 511 described by other authors as "resilient" structures, which would indicate a structure that would suffer 512 limited damage even if its design load was greatly exceeded). The difference between "tenacious" and 513 normal structures is shown by the failure of the breakwaters at Kamaishi (which could be regarded as a 514 "tenacious structure", as it suffered great damage but somehow survived the event) and that at Ofunato 515 (which was completely destroyed).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is also clear that 508 some important structures might have to be designed so that they fail in a non-catastrophic way. These 509 were described by Kato (2012) as "tenacious structures", representing a structure that would slowly fail 510 over the course of the event while retaining some functionality (this idea is similar to what has been 511 described by other authors as "resilient" structures, which would indicate a structure that would suffer 512 limited damage even if its design load was greatly exceeded). The difference between "tenacious" and 513 normal structures is shown by the failure of the breakwaters at Kamaishi (which could be regarded as a 514 "tenacious structure", as it suffered great damage but somehow survived the event) and that at Ofunato 515 (which was completely destroyed).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A prolonged overflowing effect would generate a very intense current, and many 478 structures along the Tohoku coastline appeared to have failed due to erosion of the landside toe of the 479 structure. This has led some researchers (Kato et al, 2012, Sakakiyama, 2012, Hanzawa, 2012 to state 480 that the failure mode is directly related to this overflowing current. Nevertheless, the initial impact of 481 the wave also has an effect on the breakwater armour, and it would appear logical that once this initial 482 wave shock has been absorbed, the overflowing current would have no effect on the armour units.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overturning of a seawall as observed on the Ryoishi Coast, Iwate Prefecture, during the 2011 Tōhoku tsunami may occur if the overturning moment induced by the wave load on the seawall during tsunami run-up or drawdown is larger than the resistance moment due to the weight of the seawall [Kato et al, 2012].…”
Section: 2-hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsunami drawdown also leads to parapet failure, in particular because parapets are designed only for loads of incident waves, and not for drawdown [Kato et al, 2012].…”
Section: 1-imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation