1986
DOI: 10.13182/nt86-a33780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Defense Waste Glass Dissolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Na/Si ratios changed considerably differently from each other at the beginning of the reaction: The Na/Si ratios of the solutions at 225~ experiments increased rapidly but those of the 150~ experiments decreased. This observation is probably due to increases in pH values with temperature, which stimulate the leaching rate of Si in high temperature experiments (Barkatt et al, 1986). However, the rates of change tended to decrease during the reaction and kept apparently higher values than those of the original obsidian.…”
Section: Chemistry Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The Na/Si ratios changed considerably differently from each other at the beginning of the reaction: The Na/Si ratios of the solutions at 225~ experiments increased rapidly but those of the 150~ experiments decreased. This observation is probably due to increases in pH values with temperature, which stimulate the leaching rate of Si in high temperature experiments (Barkatt et al, 1986). However, the rates of change tended to decrease during the reaction and kept apparently higher values than those of the original obsidian.…”
Section: Chemistry Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Table 7 lists the DG T,hyd and the measured forward rate of dissolution for the LW-1 and LW-2 glass specimens tested in this study measured at T = 40°C and pH 9. In addition to these data, Table 7 includes data for a wide variety of synthetic and natural glass samples taken from the literature (Barkatt et al, 1986;Gíslason and Eugster, 1987;Perera and Doremus, 1991;Bourcier et al, 1992;Mazer and Walther, 1994;Bakel et al, 1996;Cooper and Cox, 1996;Daux et al, 1997;Seidel et al, 1997;Bourcier, 1998;Icenhower and Dove, 2000;Hamilton et al, 2001;Oelkers and Gíslason, 2001;Vernaz et al, 2001;Yokoyama and Banfield, 2002). These include amorphous silica (AMS), albite (Ab), jadeite (Jd), nepheline (Ne), reedmergnerite (Rd) soda-lime glasses (S-L), sodium aluminosilicate (NAS), pyrex (Pyrex), and other borosilicate (BS) and boroaluminosilicate (BAS) glass.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Free Energy Of Hydration (Feh) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large amount of information on the glass-water reaction collected over the past 25 years has been summarized in the ''glass compendium" (Cunnane et al 1994a(Cunnane et al , 1994b and numerous reviews (Barkatt et al 1986, Hench et al 1986, Bunker et al 1988, Casey and Bunker 1990, Werme et al 1990, Bourcier 1991, Vernaz and Dussossoy 1992, Bourcier 1994, Strachan and Croak 2000, Vernaz et al 2001, Icenhower et al 2004, Van Iseghem et al 2007). Based on these reviews, the glass dissolution reaction can be divided into five regimes or stages (Figure 2.1) that occur as the reaction proceeds (e.g., Stage I, II, III, IV, and V).…”
Section: Stages Of Glass Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%