1983
DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(83)90030-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of deformation under shock loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, unless the flyer and target are made of the same material, there is inevitably a region at the impact surface that is not in uniaxial strain but has a shear component present simply due to the difference in Poisson's ratio at this site. Such a feature has been observed microstructurally in metals (Mogilevsky & Newman 1983). Thus the impact face is a site seeing the highest strain rates, having the largest flaws and experiencing additional loading modes relative to the bulk of the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Additionally, unless the flyer and target are made of the same material, there is inevitably a region at the impact surface that is not in uniaxial strain but has a shear component present simply due to the difference in Poisson's ratio at this site. Such a feature has been observed microstructurally in metals (Mogilevsky & Newman 1983). Thus the impact face is a site seeing the highest strain rates, having the largest flaws and experiencing additional loading modes relative to the bulk of the material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Such a dependence of dislocations generation has been also previously studied in quasi-static relaxation simulation in uniaxially compressed fcc crystals. 11) …”
Section: Simulation Technique and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These include spallation within the target (dynamic tensile failure) and non-onedimensional, late-time plastic deformation due to lateral release loading (Stevens & Tuler 1971;Gray et al 1989;Gray 1993Gray , 2000. Shock recovery techniques have been developed over the past years using varying means of trapping momentum and different devices to introduce the pulse (Smith 1958;Dieter 1961;Zukas 1966;Mahajan 1970;Murr 1981;Mogilevsky & Newman 1983;Murr & Meyers 1983;Mogilevskii 1985;Meyers 1994;Llorca et al 2002). These techniques include design-orientation simulation to optimize target geometry (DeCarli & Meyers 1981;Rabie et al 1984;Tanaka et al 1984;Norwood et al 1986;Clifton et al 1990;Nellis & Gratz 1993;Hagelberg et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%