2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-012-7217-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of femtosecond laser ablation of dielectrics revealed by double pump–probe experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact ionization, which may lead to electron avalanche, is not introduced here since it is negligible for laser pulse duration shorter than roughly 100 fs [4]. Recent experimental investigations using time-resolved interferometry in fused silica confirm this statement [39]. Our choice not to include impact ionization is also motivated by keeping the simplest reliable modeling to clearly exhibit the role of the MIP on the electron dynamics.…”
Section: Kinetic Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact ionization, which may lead to electron avalanche, is not introduced here since it is negligible for laser pulse duration shorter than roughly 100 fs [4]. Recent experimental investigations using time-resolved interferometry in fused silica confirm this statement [39]. Our choice not to include impact ionization is also motivated by keeping the simplest reliable modeling to clearly exhibit the role of the MIP on the electron dynamics.…”
Section: Kinetic Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, avalanche-ionization can result in an efficient energy deposition [5]. The process, which is mainly responsible for the energy deposition, depends strongly on the laser intensity, thus on the focal volume, pulse energy, pulse duration, and on material properties like the band gap energy [6]- [9]. Manuscript Due to these intensity dependent nonlinear absorption processes the resulting material modifications are limited to the focal volume of the fs-laser radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it seems to make more physical sense to take a criteria on the absorbed energy in the material and it was recently demonstrated that it was indeed more appropriate than the critical density one [28]. The described model in the previous section has the ability to evaluate in space and time the amount of energy absorbed in the material, this energy being in the form of excited electrons.…”
Section: Damage Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 98%