1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90061-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of illegitimate recombination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This, if the RET/PTC intrachromosomal inversion arose as a result of activation of the recombination machinery or errors in cleavage by enzymes that cut and join DNA (such as topoisomerase II), one would expect the breaks to be located within recombinase signal sequences at both participating loci, to have similarity in sequences at the breakpoints, or to be clustered at certain speci®c hypersensitive DNA regions such as AT-rich regions, Alu repeats, repeated purine/pyrimidine tracts, and other chromosomal regions with increased lability (fragile) sites (Ehrlich et al, 1993;Stary and Sarasin, 1992;Hyrien et al, 1987). By contrast, our results indicate that in post-Chernobyl tumors the RET/PTC breakpoints were distributed relatively randomly across the respective introns, except for clustering in the Alu sequences of one of the two contributing genes, with no breakpoints occurring at exactly the same base or within an identical sequence in any of the 12 tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, if the RET/PTC intrachromosomal inversion arose as a result of activation of the recombination machinery or errors in cleavage by enzymes that cut and join DNA (such as topoisomerase II), one would expect the breaks to be located within recombinase signal sequences at both participating loci, to have similarity in sequences at the breakpoints, or to be clustered at certain speci®c hypersensitive DNA regions such as AT-rich regions, Alu repeats, repeated purine/pyrimidine tracts, and other chromosomal regions with increased lability (fragile) sites (Ehrlich et al, 1993;Stary and Sarasin, 1992;Hyrien et al, 1987). By contrast, our results indicate that in post-Chernobyl tumors the RET/PTC breakpoints were distributed relatively randomly across the respective introns, except for clustering in the Alu sequences of one of the two contributing genes, with no breakpoints occurring at exactly the same base or within an identical sequence in any of the 12 tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Illegitimate recombination refers to a collection of different reactions generally occurring at closely spaced DNA sequences that share little or no homology (332)(333)(334)(335). This process is RecA independent and takes place when DNA strands anneal in aberrant configurations following a problem in DNA processing (Fig.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Homologous and Illegitimate Recombinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, a deletion and a duplication are not reciprocal outcomes. Slipped misalignment is frequently associated with additional symmetry elements flanking direct repeats that can promote pausing of DNA replication, promote strand slippage and stabilize the misaligned sequences (Glickman & Ripley, 1984 ;Trinh & Sinden, 1991, 1993Ehrlich et al, 1993). The requirement for stabilization may be particularly important for slippage at RPS clusters since the large size of RPS units (2n1-2n3 kb) would suggest a relatively unstable loop.…”
Section: Models For Rps Reorganizationmentioning
confidence: 99%