2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of influence of body checking on binge eating

Abstract: Despite the theorized role of body checking behaviours in the maintenance process of binge eating, the mechanisms by which they may impact binge eating remain unclear. Using objectification model of eating pathology as a theoretical framework, the authors examined the potential intervening roles of body shame, appearance anxiety, and dietary restraint in the pathway between body checking and binge eating. Data collected from a large sample of treatment-seeking people with Bulimic-type Eating Disorders (N = 801… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants categorized with mild, moderate, severe, and extreme severity, based on their pretreatment clinician-rated BE frequency, differed significantly from each other in physical characteristics (BMI) and another 16 variables of clinical interest assessed at pretreatment regarding ED psychopathology and putative maintenance factors, psychiatric comorbidity and distress, and psychosocial impairment, with significantly higher levels/rates across the severity groups. These findings expand on recent work revealing that the BED severity groups were statistically distinguishable in levels of ED psychopathology (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015a, 2015b and depression (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015a) and are also consistent with earlier research indicating that greater BE frequency was significantly associated with higher mean BMI, ED psychopathology, lifetime and current psychiatric comorbidity, and psychosocial impairment (Dakanalis, Carr a, Calogero, Fida, et al, 2015;Dakanalis, Carr a, Timko, et al, 2015;Dakanalis, Favagrossa, Clerici, et al, 2015;Grilo, White, & Masheb, 2009;Peterson, Miller, Crow, Thuras, & Mitchell, 2005;Pla-Sanjuanelo et al, 2015;Striegel, Bedrosian, Wang, & Schwartz, 2012;Wilfley et al, 2000). In addition, in keeping with past research (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015a;Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015b;Smink, van Hoeken, Oldehinkel, & Hoek, 2014), the severity groups were statistically indistinguishable in demographics and age-of-BED onset, lending some credence to scholars'…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Participants categorized with mild, moderate, severe, and extreme severity, based on their pretreatment clinician-rated BE frequency, differed significantly from each other in physical characteristics (BMI) and another 16 variables of clinical interest assessed at pretreatment regarding ED psychopathology and putative maintenance factors, psychiatric comorbidity and distress, and psychosocial impairment, with significantly higher levels/rates across the severity groups. These findings expand on recent work revealing that the BED severity groups were statistically distinguishable in levels of ED psychopathology (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015a, 2015b and depression (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015a) and are also consistent with earlier research indicating that greater BE frequency was significantly associated with higher mean BMI, ED psychopathology, lifetime and current psychiatric comorbidity, and psychosocial impairment (Dakanalis, Carr a, Calogero, Fida, et al, 2015;Dakanalis, Carr a, Timko, et al, 2015;Dakanalis, Favagrossa, Clerici, et al, 2015;Grilo, White, & Masheb, 2009;Peterson, Miller, Crow, Thuras, & Mitchell, 2005;Pla-Sanjuanelo et al, 2015;Striegel, Bedrosian, Wang, & Schwartz, 2012;Wilfley et al, 2000). In addition, in keeping with past research (Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015a;Grilo, Ivezaj, & White, 2015b;Smink, van Hoeken, Oldehinkel, & Hoek, 2014), the severity groups were statistically indistinguishable in demographics and age-of-BED onset, lending some credence to scholars'…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It can also magnify the discrepancy between actual and ideal body attributes and/or perceived body imperfections (e.g. Dakanalis, Carrà, Timko et al ., ; Fitzsimmons‐Craft et al ., ). Because of this, self‐objectification may play a key role in the acceleration of body dissatisfaction, associated affective distress and/or negative self‐evaluation, thereby potentiating meaningful increases in disordered eating symptoms or maintaining existing symptomatology (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As the design of our studies precludes long term examination of the stability of the SAAS and of ME/I over time, future studies need to address these issues. How the SAAS affects additional specific behaviours that are associated with concerns about appearance (i.e., compulsive exercising, or anabolic steroid use [76][77][78][79][80][81][82]) needs to be also elucidated. Finally, in this work the DSM-IV criteria for EDs and SAD [28] were used as data were collected before the official publication of the DSM-5 [83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%