1983
DOI: 10.1172/jci110908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of Insulin Resistance in Aging

Abstract: A B S T R A C T We have studied 17 elderly and 27 nonelderly, nonobese subjects (mean age 69±1 and 37±2 yr, respectively) to assess the mechanisms responsible for the abnormal carbohydrate tolerance associated with aging. Serum glucose and insulin levels were significantly elevated in the elderly subjects compared with the nonelderly subjects during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, suggesting an insulin resistant state. Peripheral insulin sensitivity was assessed in both groups using the euglycemic glucose … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
295
4
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
33
295
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…During the CPS phase, subordinate mice developed hyperglycemia when fed both a STD or a HFD (Figure 3a), a finding which is consistent with our previous work (Sanghez et al., 2013) and that could have set the stage for a later metabolic dysregulation and impact later survival outcomes (Fink, Kolterman, Griffin & Olefsky, 1983; Houtkooper et al., 2011). Subordinate mice were also characterized by increased body weight when fed a STD (Figure 3b–d) despite eating comparably to dominant mice (Figure 3e) that resulted in a greater food efficiency (Figure 3f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the CPS phase, subordinate mice developed hyperglycemia when fed both a STD or a HFD (Figure 3a), a finding which is consistent with our previous work (Sanghez et al., 2013) and that could have set the stage for a later metabolic dysregulation and impact later survival outcomes (Fink, Kolterman, Griffin & Olefsky, 1983; Houtkooper et al., 2011). Subordinate mice were also characterized by increased body weight when fed a STD (Figure 3b–d) despite eating comparably to dominant mice (Figure 3e) that resulted in a greater food efficiency (Figure 3f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group 1 comprised control rats, receiving daily subcutaneous injections of saline for 13 days, group 2 were Dex-treated rats subjected to a daily subcutaneous injection of Dex phosphate (0.125 mg/kg in saline) for 13 days, group 3 Dex -VOSO 4 -treated rats also received vanadyl sulphate (0.5 mg/ml in the drinking water) starting after 4 days of Dex treatment, when the effects of Dex were clearly apparent (7), and group 4 were rats treated with VOSO 4 for 9 days with oral VOSO 4 only. Daily VOSO 4 intake, calculated on the basis of water consumption, averaged 16.0^0.20 and 22.5^0.60 mg in 3-and 18-month-old animals respectively.…”
Section: Dexamethasone and Voso 4 Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood glucose was measured every 5 -10 min by the glucose oxidase method at the patient's bedside (YSI 2300 stat plus glucose analyser, YSI Incorporated, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Fifty units recombinant human insulin (Actrapid; Novo Nordisk, North Rocks, Australia) were added to 500 ml of 4% succinylated gelatin solution (Gelofusine; B Braun, Castle Hill, Australia) and then a primed infusion of 50 mU/m 2 /min, which is in excess of that required to completely suppress hepatic gluconeogenesis in older men (13,56), was commenced. A variable rate of infusion of 20% glucose (Baxter Healthcare, Toongabbie, Australia) was titrated (57) to maintain a blood glucose of 4.5 mmol/l.…”
Section: Insulin Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In older men, low serum testosterone can predict future development of NIDDM (8 -10) and central obesity (11). Since normal ageing is associated with progressive impairment of carbohydrate tolerance (12) which is partly due to increasing insulin resistance (13), older individuals are an appropriate target group in whom timely intervention (perhaps with androgen supplementation) may delay progression to NIDDM and associated morbidity. Conversely, interventions that worsen insulin resistance may be particularly harmful due to increased background risk and reduced compensatory reserve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%