2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of nanostructure and metastable phase formations in the surface melted layers of a HCPEB-treated D2 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
109
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
6
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are very different from the one recently obtained for an initially textured FeAl intermetallic alloy treated by HCPEB. [15] In this case, the combination of the thermal effect with the shock wave induced dynamic recrystallization, which, in turn, generated strong texture modifications and reduction of grain size by the formation of subgrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are very different from the one recently obtained for an initially textured FeAl intermetallic alloy treated by HCPEB. [15] In this case, the combination of the thermal effect with the shock wave induced dynamic recrystallization, which, in turn, generated strong texture modifications and reduction of grain size by the formation of subgrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, assuming that all the solute elements are redistributed in the melt, the M s temperature estimated from various formulas developed for steels by Nehrenberg, [21] Andrews, [22] or other authors [23] always gave M s values lower than 60 K. Another factor that must have contributed to the inhibition of the martensitic transformation is the ultra-fine size of the austenite domains formed in this melted layer by the rapid solidification process. [24,25] Indeed, it is well established that the triggering of the martensitic transformation depends on the chemistry as well as on the local microstructural features that may (1) act as nucleation sites (deformation bands, dislocation distribution heterogeneities) or, on the contrary, (2) inhibit its formation by constraining effects (fine grain size). [26][27][28][29] The presence of this metastable homogeneous c layer formed by the HCPEB treatment at the top surface is very important for potential applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the large differences of heat conductivity between the tungsten carbides and the Co binder, voids were generated by the different shrinkage during the rapid solidification. The formation of craters was a result of the sublayer melt eruption as discussed elsewhere [24]. Considering the surface simulations in Figure 8, there were liquid and graphite in the surface melt at ~3200 K according to the ternary phase diagram [25], and this composite would be kept down under a rapid cooling rate of 1.26 × 10 8 K/s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, stress waves, shock waves, vibration and other physical phenomena can also be induced on the material surface, which results in extraordinary modification effects, such as improved strength, microhardness, wear resistance and corrosion resistant properties [9][10][11] . Therefore, by using HCPEB surface modification techniques, many researchers had studied the surface strengthening and surface alloying of steels, magnesium alloys, aluminium alloys, etc 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%