2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1mt00063b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of nickel toxicity in microorganisms

Abstract: Summary Nickel has long been known to be an important human toxicant, including having the ability to form carcinomas, but until recently nickel was believed to be an issue only to microorganisms living in nickel-rich serpentine soils or areas contaminated by industrial pollution. This assumption was overturned by the discovery of a nickel defense system (RcnR/RcnA) found in microorganisms that live in a wide range of environmental niches, suggesting that nickel homeostasis is a general biological concern. To … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
189
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
(271 reference statements)
7
189
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The enhancement of the negative impacts of cobalt and nickel by copper is not surprising; such interactions between toxic metals have been observed before (16,17). The mitigation of nickel toxicity by iron is also predictable: it supports previous research showing that nickel disrupts iron-containing enzymes and increases the expression of the iron uptake machinery in E. coli (38,39). Cu(II), like Ni(II), is known to interfere with iron-containing enzymes (15,40), which makes our finding that Fe(II) and Cu(II) interact synergistically to inhibit growth particularly interesting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The enhancement of the negative impacts of cobalt and nickel by copper is not surprising; such interactions between toxic metals have been observed before (16,17). The mitigation of nickel toxicity by iron is also predictable: it supports previous research showing that nickel disrupts iron-containing enzymes and increases the expression of the iron uptake machinery in E. coli (38,39). Cu(II), like Ni(II), is known to interfere with iron-containing enzymes (15,40), which makes our finding that Fe(II) and Cu(II) interact synergistically to inhibit growth particularly interesting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Using qRT-PCR, we tested the response of Rpal_4085 under anoxic conditions to the cations Mn(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II), Ca(II), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ). With the exception of Zn(II) and Ca(II), these divalent metals are known to be redox active at physiological pH (19,(26)(27)(28)(29). We used H 2 O 2 as an oxidative stress-inducing control and Zn(II) and Ca(II) as nonredox active divalent metal controls.…”
Section: Mutant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excess iron (Fe) is harmful due to its participation in Fenton chemistry, which produces a highly reactive hydroxyl radical that can damage biomolecules (4-7). Other transition metals, including Mn, Zn, cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), and copper (Cu), become toxic at high concentrations partly because they compete for each other's cognate metal-binding sites in enzymes (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Regardless of the mechanism of metal toxicity, bacteria have evolved ways to minimize the deleterious impact of metal ion excess.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%