sperm injection (ICSI), [3] in vitro fertilization (IVF), [4] and intrauterine insemination (IUI). [5] In ICSI, as the most invasive method, an individual sperm is selected and injected directly into an egg. In IVF or IUI, a subpopulation of pre-selected sperm is introduced close to the egg to achieve fertilization. [3][4][5] The quality of selected sperm is crucial to ART, contributing significantly to the treatment success rate, live-birth rate, and offspring health. [6] However, the current clinical sperm selection practices are highly manual, subjective, and prone to operator errors, resulting in a suboptimal ART success rate, stagnating at ≈33% per cycle over the past 30 years. [7,8] The inherent challenge is to mimic the highly parallelized and 3D selection process in vivo that enables a single-cell level sorting mechanism within a relatively short timeframe. [9] Specifically, the 3D folded structure of the female reproductive tract breaks down the initial semen volume (≈1-4 mL) into a few microliters per selection event within the folded epithelial of the fallopian tube. These subfractioning events can process hundreds of millions of sperm in just a few hours. [10] Current clinical practices, however, only provide a 2D bulk scale selection alternative.Density gradient centrifugation (DGC) [11] and swim-up [12,13] are the most commonly used methods for human sperm selection in fertility clinics. In swim-up assay (SU), highly motile sperm are selected based on their ability to swim upward from the raw semen sediment into a fresh sperm media, where they are collected after ≈60 min. This method is not applicable in the case of asthenozoospermia (poor sperm motility). [14] In DGC, human sperm are separated based on their density by being forced to cross a viscosity gradient via centrifugation force that could cause sperm DNA damage and alter sperm morphology and function. [11,15] The sperm preparation method that is used in clinics is mainly chosen based on the count and motility of sperm in the human semen sample. [9] Both SU and DGC are time consuming (30-60 min), require multiple preparation steps, depend on the clinician expertise, and differ significantly from the natural selection process in vivo. [16] Moreover, the relatively long processing time of these methods and the low percentage of recovered sperm in the swim-up method (less than 20%) have considerably restricted the clinical workflow, especially Selection of high-quality sperm is crucial to assisted reproduction. However, conventional clinical methods for sperm selection are manual and prone to operator errors. This article presents 'sperm syringe', a scalable technology that mimics the highly parallelized 3D selection process in vivo via a 3D network of 560 microchannels to select high-quality sperm. Sperm syringe retrieves more than 41% of healthy sperm from the initial sperm sample in under 15 min, providing a sufficient volume (≈500 µL) and number (1,600,000) of high-quality sperm for fertility treatments. Experiments with bull and human sper...