2018
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/ydp2m
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of prediction updating - preprint

Abstract: One of the most compelling pieces of evidence for the presence of predictions in language comprehension comes from event-related potential (ERP) studies which show that encountering an adjective whose gender marking is inconsistent with that of a highly expectable noun leads to an effect at the adjective. Until now the mechanism underlying this effect has been unknown. The present study tests a novel hypothesis whereby the effect at adjectives reflects prediction updating, which in turn impacts the N400 genera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If pre-nominal ERP effects reflect the detection of a mismatch between predicted and expected gender, and gender-mismatch is detected more easily or faster for 'de' than 'het', then 'de' should have elicited a larger effect than 'het'. However, this is not what we found, and we do not believe that N400 amplitude reflects a prediction mismatch detection process (see also Kutas & Federmeier, 2011;Rabovsky et al 2018;Szewczyk & Wodniecka, 2018;Van Berkum, 2009). Alternatively, unexpected 'het' may elicit a larger gender effect because 'het' is a lower-frequent word taking the place of the more frequent article 'de'.…”
Section: Implications For Pre-nominal Prediction-effectscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…If pre-nominal ERP effects reflect the detection of a mismatch between predicted and expected gender, and gender-mismatch is detected more easily or faster for 'de' than 'het', then 'de' should have elicited a larger effect than 'het'. However, this is not what we found, and we do not believe that N400 amplitude reflects a prediction mismatch detection process (see also Kutas & Federmeier, 2011;Rabovsky et al 2018;Szewczyk & Wodniecka, 2018;Van Berkum, 2009). Alternatively, unexpected 'het' may elicit a larger gender effect because 'het' is a lower-frequent word taking the place of the more frequent article 'de'.…”
Section: Implications For Pre-nominal Prediction-effectscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Two non-word repetition tasks were used, one in Polish (Szewczyk & Wodniecka, 2012) and one in English (Szewczyk, Wodniecka, Otwinowska, & Chiat, 2012). The creation of the task was initiated as a part of the COST Action ISO804, which aimed at designing tools for cross-linguistic comparisons between bilingual children’s languages (Armon-Lotem et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, ERP studies of language processing use coarse-grained predictors like cloze rates, which often lack the precision to differentiate different neural computational models (for discus-sion, see Yan et al, 2017;Rabovsky et al, 2018). To overcome such limitations, a main line of attack has been to extract measures from probabilistic language models and evaluate them against ERP amplitudes (Frank et al, 2015;Brouwer et al, 2017;Rabovsky et al, 2018;Delaney-Busch et al, 2019;Fitz and Chang, 2018;Szewczyk and Wodniecka, 2018;Biemann et al, 2015).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%