1999
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00225.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of the Spatial Distribution of QT Intervals on the Epicardial and Body Surfaces

Abstract: QTI is not a robust index of local recovery time on the cardiac surface. QTI distributions were affected by the position of the zero potential line, which is unrelated to local recovery times. However, similarities in the patterns of QTI and recovery times in some regions may help explain the frequently reported predictive value of QT dispersion. Preliminary results indicate STT area may be a better index of recovery time and recovery time dispersion on the epicardium than QTI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 -14 A variety of studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the sensitivity of body surface dispersion measures to changes in the dispersion of myocardial repolarization. 2,4,6 The conclusions from these reports were based on in vitro or nonconcurrent recordings of body surface and epicardial activity, and just 2 of these studies 2,12 incorporated dense arrays of body surface signals (which were simulated in the latter 12 ). Using arrays of simultaneously sampled torso and epicardial electrograms in vivo, we have confirmed that changes in myocardial ARI dispersion caused by regional ventricular ischemia may not be readily identifiable by use of temporal indices derived from the 12-lead ECG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9 -14 A variety of studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the sensitivity of body surface dispersion measures to changes in the dispersion of myocardial repolarization. 2,4,6 The conclusions from these reports were based on in vitro or nonconcurrent recordings of body surface and epicardial activity, and just 2 of these studies 2,12 incorporated dense arrays of body surface signals (which were simulated in the latter 12 ). Using arrays of simultaneously sampled torso and epicardial electrograms in vivo, we have confirmed that changes in myocardial ARI dispersion caused by regional ventricular ischemia may not be readily identifiable by use of temporal indices derived from the 12-lead ECG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive body surface electrical recordings have been used to define indices thought to reflect abnormal electrophysiological substrate. 1,2 However, the reliability of body surface measures (for example, recovery time dispersion, QT dispersion, and QRST integral mapping) to accurately detect myocardial substrate is viewed as being useful, [3][4][5][6] marginal, 2,7,8 or having no predictive power. 9 -11 Indeed, recent work has shown that indices derived from simulated body surface signals were inadequate in reflecting the underlying measured epicardial activationrecovery intervals (ARIs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…QT dispersion has been used to characterize myocardial repolarization, but recent studies showed that QT dispersion is unrelated, 28,29 so further study will be required to identify the clinical importance and electrophysiological role of QT dispersion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 -10 Furthermore, the QTd measure was shown to depend on variables not related to myocardial repolarization. 11 These factors have combined to call into question the clinical usefulness of QTd. 12,13 A major assumption of QTd and QRST integral maps is that body-surface potentials preserve the spatial distribution of epicardial potentials and associated cardiac electrical sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%