2009
DOI: 10.1002/apj.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of ultrasound foam interactions

Abstract: An experimental investigation into the effects of two frequencies of low-power ultrasound on detergent (Teepol) stabilised air-water foams is presented. Foam was subjected to ultrasound at 28 and 40 kHz with a powerto-foam volume ratio of approximately 3 W l −1 with particular consideration being given to the acoustic impedance discontinuity between air and water. The foam height, liquid drainage and collapse behaviour were compared to experiments conducted without ultrasound. In the case of 40 kHz ultrasound,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied frequencies between 42 and 168 kHz might specifically induce resonant effects in the foam leading to higher drainage without atomization. These are well above the frequencies used by Winterburn [25], but within the range of McHardy [32].…”
Section: Impact Of Liquid-guided Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The applied frequencies between 42 and 168 kHz might specifically induce resonant effects in the foam leading to higher drainage without atomization. These are well above the frequencies used by Winterburn [25], but within the range of McHardy [32].…”
Section: Impact Of Liquid-guided Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The main potential is in the use in wastewater treatment plants. Previously, sterilization of bacteria research has focused of using cavitation for defoaming and sterilization of the environment [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winterburn and Martin (2009) investigated the effects of two frequencies of low-power ultrasound on foam formed by the detergent Teepol. This is assumed to be the result of a combination of factors: partial vacuum on the foam bubble surface produced by high acoustic pressure, resulting in a partial negative pressure above the foam encouraging gas release, possible degassing of the liquid itself as a result of bubble coalescence, atomization from the liquid film surface, and cavitation and acoustic streaming within the bulk system.…”
Section: Foam Destructionmentioning
confidence: 99%