2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38977-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms to Handle Structural Variability in MATLAB/Simulink Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented three-layer structure ensures the variability of components and models as well, similarly to [10]. Variability means that libraries in the first and second layers might be changed or replaced by alternate versions.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Three-layer Model Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented three-layer structure ensures the variability of components and models as well, similarly to [10]. Variability means that libraries in the first and second layers might be changed or replaced by alternate versions.…”
Section: Derivation Of the Three-layer Model Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the usage of these features is spontaneous rather than systematic. In paper [10], component variability and reusability concepts in MATLAB/Simulink environment are discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Simulink internal implementation isn't different to the CME-concept. [8] presents a concept for modeling variability in Simulink based on a 3 layered template approach. The concept enhances the usability of existing Simulink variability mechanisms by adding another layer of abstraction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is very similar to the MEMA concept but adds a special input and output signal processing to cope with interface changes. We decided to not include [8] and [4] in our study as both are similar to the MEMA concept and because there was no implementation of the concepts available to us.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective code clone detection will support perfective maintenance. Up to the present, several code clone detection methods have been proposed (Petersen 2012;Al-Batran 2011;Leitner et al 2013). Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools have been carried out by (Bellon and Koschke 2014;Bellon et al 2007) and (Roy and Cordy 2007;Roy et al 2009).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%