2003
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12023.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata

Abstract: Free‐ranging groups are frequently assorted by phenotypic characters. However, very little is known about the underlying processes that determine this structuring. In this study, we investigate the mechanisms underlying the phenotypic composition of shoals of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in a high‐predation stream in Trinidad's Northern Mountain Range. We collected 57 entire wild shoals, which were strongly assorted by body length. Shoal encounters staged within an experimental arena showed shoal fission (but… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
217
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
217
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we find support for complex movement rules, we considered only a single, relatively small group size of 10 individuals (although this falls well within the normal range of shoal sizes found in the wild for this species [54]). Theoretical work predicts that group size and density may be important in determining the best movement rule to follow, with simpler rules favoured when shoals are larger and the individuals within them are more dispersed [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we find support for complex movement rules, we considered only a single, relatively small group size of 10 individuals (although this falls well within the normal range of shoal sizes found in the wild for this species [54]). Theoretical work predicts that group size and density may be important in determining the best movement rule to follow, with simpler rules favoured when shoals are larger and the individuals within them are more dispersed [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that females can use a similar strategy, associating with individuals based on sexual attractiveness, but in this case, reducing their attractiveness to males (and thereby male harassment) by choosing social partners within a shoal that are more attractive than themselves. In guppies, shoal composition is very dynamic, with males joining and leaving shoals on a time scale of seconds [16]. Under these conditions, females are not able to avoid encounters with males and males will harass both receptive and non-receptive females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predict that female guppies can reduce male attention by making association decisions based on social partner attractiveness; that is, given that they will encounter males on a regular basis [16], they can reduce the male attention they receive by choosing to partner with the more sexually attractive, receptive females in the shoal. We expect that non-receptive females will show a strong preference for receptive social partners, but that this preference will be weaker, or perhaps even absent, in receptive females as they show interest in male sexual behaviour and therefore are not likely to be attempting to reduce male attention [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Persistent associations were present in this population between pairs of females even after accounting for body-size preferences, suggesting shoaling decisions could be based on active partner choice. These associations persisted over several days, despite the fact that guppy shoals disperse at night and reform anew each morning (Croft et al, 2003). While a preference for familiar individuals had been demonstrated in guppies under laboratory conditions using binary choice trials (Griffiths & Magurran, 1997), Croft et al (2004) provided compelling evidence that such preferences can also be expressed in wild populations.…”
Section: The Advent Of Modern Social Network Analysis In Nonhuman Sysmentioning
confidence: 91%