2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms underlying the attachment and spreading of human osteoblasts: From transient interactions to focal adhesions on vitronectin-grafted bioactive surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4a, 16] Theh erein demonstrated results underline this positive effect of HBP, since cell count, size,and survival are increased compared to the platform MP.E ven better results could be achieved by coating Ti with MP-RGD since af urther increase in cell spreading,n umber of adhered cells and viability was determined. [20] Additive effects of RGD and HBP could also be observed testing the herein presented peptides with ap remature osteoblast-like cell line (MG-63). [17] Notably,acombination of HBP and RGD in one peptide (MP-RGD-HBP) induced the highest average cell area, statistically significant to blank Ti,f ibronectin, MP,M P-HBP,and MP-RGD,indicating acollaborative behavior.…”
Section: In Memory Of Klaus Braunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4a, 16] Theh erein demonstrated results underline this positive effect of HBP, since cell count, size,and survival are increased compared to the platform MP.E ven better results could be achieved by coating Ti with MP-RGD since af urther increase in cell spreading,n umber of adhered cells and viability was determined. [20] Additive effects of RGD and HBP could also be observed testing the herein presented peptides with ap remature osteoblast-like cell line (MG-63). [17] Notably,acombination of HBP and RGD in one peptide (MP-RGD-HBP) induced the highest average cell area, statistically significant to blank Ti,f ibronectin, MP,M P-HBP,and MP-RGD,indicating acollaborative behavior.…”
Section: In Memory Of Klaus Braunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] The use of bioactive coatings on implant surfaces has also been investigated. [9][10][11][12] Research on the effects of different surface properties on osseointegration should ideally follow a hierarchical approach before clinical trials. 13 New biomaterials should be tested first in vitro, then in vivo in animal models to ascertain their safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are four key steps by which the biomaterial substrate determines cell fate: (1) biomaterial design, (2) protein adsorption on surface, (3) cell adhesion and signal transduction and (4) cell fate determination and can induce the reorganisation of actin microfilaments and promote cell adhesion and spreading, which in turn modulates cell behaviour such as cell shape and migration (Scotchford et al 2003;Howlett et al 1994). As a result, many studies have attempted to increase the deposition of fibronectin and vitronectin to improve the attachment, growth and osteoblastic differentiation of osteoprogenitor cells (Tran et al 2012;Brun et al 2013;Alves et al 2008;Woo et al 2007b). For example, nanoporous titanium surfaces have been designed to specifically increase the adsorption of fibronectin and vitronectin, which promoted osteoblast attachment and proliferation (Rivera-Chacon et al 2013).…”
Section: Protein Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%