Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry III 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b0-08-045047-4/00006-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic Aspects of Olefin-polymerization Catalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 293 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discovery that homogeneous late transition metal catalysts can exhibit olefin polymerization activity similar to that of early transition metal catalysts led to a major paradigm shift in olefin polymerization catalysis. Because late transition metal catalysts (e.g., Ni, Pd) are far less susceptible to inhibition by heteroatom donors compared to their early transition metal counterparts (e.g., Ti, Hf, Zr), the former typically exhibit greater tolerance of polar monomers, solvents, and impurities compared to the latter. Although recent developments in nickel and palladium catalysis have led to the creation of systems that can copolymerize ethylene and polar vinyl monomers through a coordination–insertion mechanism, the resulting polymers tend to have low molecular weight and the catalyst activity tends to be poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery that homogeneous late transition metal catalysts can exhibit olefin polymerization activity similar to that of early transition metal catalysts led to a major paradigm shift in olefin polymerization catalysis. Because late transition metal catalysts (e.g., Ni, Pd) are far less susceptible to inhibition by heteroatom donors compared to their early transition metal counterparts (e.g., Ti, Hf, Zr), the former typically exhibit greater tolerance of polar monomers, solvents, and impurities compared to the latter. Although recent developments in nickel and palladium catalysis have led to the creation of systems that can copolymerize ethylene and polar vinyl monomers through a coordination–insertion mechanism, the resulting polymers tend to have low molecular weight and the catalyst activity tends to be poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although the Ni catalysts all successfully catalyzed ethylene and MA copolymerization, they typically showed low activity (<5 kg mol –1 h –1 ) with the exception of J (86 kg mol –1 h –1 ). The reduced reactivity of metal catalysts in the presence of functional olefins is attributed to σ-coordination of the polar group to the active catalyst or back-chelation by an inserted polar monomer . Third, symmetric catalyst I appears to perform just as well as, if not better than, most of the asymmetric catalysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The reduced reactivity of metal catalysts in the presence of functional olefins is attributed to σ-coordination of the polar group to the active catalyst or back-chelation by an inserted polar monomer. 50 Third, symmetric catalyst I appears to perform just as well as, if not better than, most of the asymmetric catalysts. Thus, it is unclear if asymmetric catalysts have any intrinsic advantages over symmetric ones in terms of their ability to copolymerize polar monomers.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%