2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3079524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic benefits of millisecond annealing for diffusion and activation of boron in silicon

Abstract: Millisecond annealing techniques with flash lamps or lasers have become increasingly common for activating dopants and eliminating implantation-induced damage after ion implantation for transistor junction formation in silicon. Empirical data show that such techniques confer significant benefits, but key physical mechanisms underlying these benefits are not well understood. The present work employs numerical simulation and analytical modeling to show that for boron, millisecond annealing reduces unwanted dopan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, even though the faster ramping of millisecond annealing pushes up the cluster dissociation temperatures, the maximum Si interstitial concentrations still greatly exceed those for spike annealing. The benefits from millisecond annealing derive from the shortened time scale that outweighs the effects of increased Si interstitial concentration (1). Simulations for implanted boron show that, although the characteristic rate for kicking dopant out of the lattice is almost two orders of magnitude larger for millisecond annealing than for spike annealing (due mainly to the higher interstitial concentration), the corresponding time scale in millisecond annealing is almost three orders of magnitude smaller.…”
Section: Annealingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, even though the faster ramping of millisecond annealing pushes up the cluster dissociation temperatures, the maximum Si interstitial concentrations still greatly exceed those for spike annealing. The benefits from millisecond annealing derive from the shortened time scale that outweighs the effects of increased Si interstitial concentration (1). Simulations for implanted boron show that, although the characteristic rate for kicking dopant out of the lattice is almost two orders of magnitude larger for millisecond annealing than for spike annealing (due mainly to the higher interstitial concentration), the corresponding time scale in millisecond annealing is almost three orders of magnitude smaller.…”
Section: Annealingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PA is practically stopped when it reaches an acceptable level. If normal rapid thermal annealing (RTA) is used, PA requires a longer annealing time  a above 1 ms (Kwok et al, 2009;Race, 2010) and a higher annealing temperature T a above approximately 10 3 K. However, studies on methods that could practically replace traditional RTA are still ongoing (Larson, Williams, & Current, 2011). For example, microwave (Thompson et al, 2005) and pulsed-laser beams (Jones, Kuryliw, Murto, Rendon, & Talwar, 2000) have been proposed to shorten  a , and a cluster beam (Tanjo & Naito, 2011b) has been proposed to reduce T a .…”
Section: The Necessity Of the Post-annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an acceptable level is characterized in two ways. One criterion for ion implantation is that the density of the activated dopant, measured by sheet resistance (Kwok et al, 2009), should approach a maximum level of 10 17 /cm 3 -10 21 /cm 3 , which is acceptable. For example, if used a B 18 beam with an impact energy of E 0 = 337 eV/ (B atom) into a crystalline Si (c-Si) (Onoda et al, 2010) with a conventional fluence of approximately 10 15 /cm 2 , this density corresponds to a state in which approximately 30% of the dopant is substituted at lattice sites.…”
Section: The Characterization Of the Post-annealingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FLA thereby achieves annealing times comparable to the duration of the flash pulse -in the millisecond frame (Gebel et al, 2002). The mechanistic details of MA techniques, such as FLA, have been understood only recently (Kwok et al, 2009). Such methods reduce unwanted dopant spreading by greatly reducing the time for diffusion, which over-compensates for an increased concentration of Si interstitials that promote dopant spreading.…”
Section: Rtp Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%