Ni-based
catalysts have attracted much attention because of their
high catalytic activity for dry reforming of methane (DRM) reaction
and their low-cost characteristics. The deactivation caused by carbon
deposition has become a major factor restricting its application.
Mo doping is expected to improve the carbon deposition resistance
of Ni-based catalysts. In this study, we used density functional theory
(DFT) calculations and the microkinetic model to compare the catalytic
activity of Ni and MoNi4 (as a Mo-doped Ni-based catalyst
model) for the DRM reaction. By calculating the surface energies,
Ni(111) and MoNi4(001) were determined as the calculation
models. The DFT calculation results show that MoNi4 catalyst
has a stronger adsorption capacity for intermediate species. Combining
Bader charge analysis and charge density differences analysis, the
stronger adsorption capacity comes from the stronger electron donating
capacity brought about by the doping of Mo. According to our proposed
reaction network, the energy barriers of 19 elementary reactions were
calculated in detail. We found that there are similar CO2 dissociation modes (direct dissociation) and C–O bond formation
modes (CH2/CH–O oxidation) on Ni(111) and MoNi4(001). Both CH4 dissociation and CO2 dissociation on MoNi4(001) have a lower energy barrier,
while CO formation through CH2/CH–O oxidation has
a higher energy barrier. The total free energy barrier of the DRM
is lower than that of carbon deposition formation on MoNi4(001), whereas the opposite on Ni(111), means MoNi4(001)
shows strongly carbon resistance properties. At 1073.15 K and 2 bar,
the microkinetic simulation results showed that when the reaction
reaches equilibrium, MoNi4(001) is deactivated due to excessive
O*. Accordingly, the influence of O* coverage on the activation
energy of CO
2
dissociation was considered in the MoNi
4
microkinetic model. In this
way, the DRM reaction can be carried out steadily and continuously
on MoNi4(001). And the simulation results show that MoNi4 catalyst has extremely high catalytic activity and selectivity
and is basically not affected by carbon deposition and byproduct H2O. Under the same simulated conditions, MoNi4(001)
showed better catalytic activity than Ni(111). In addition, degree
of rate control (DRC) analysis showed that on MoNi4(001),
the activation of CH4 is the rate-limiting step of the
whole reaction. Through our study, one might be proposed that alloying
Ni with a small amount of active metals such as Mo can increase the
carbon deposition resistance by increasing the activation of CH4 and CO2 in an equal ratio.