2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic insights into liquid-phase autoxidation of cyclohexene in acetonitrile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption can also be supported by several studies on Cocontaining oxide nanocatalysts by Peng and coworkers, [10a,19,20,26] in which Co 3 + species were found to be the active sites for O 2 activation, [26] whereas Co 2 + cations were essential for the catalytic decomposition of 2-cyclohexene-1-hydroperoxide. [9] These Co-based catalysts enabled moderate to high cyclohexene conversions between 62 and 79 % with moderate product selectivities of 27 to 47 % to the main product 2cyclohexene-1-one (Figure 1, green columns) and leaching of the active Co species was excluded by ICP-MS measurements identifying the reaction to occur heterogeneously. [9] On the contrary, CuO nanoparticles provided a much higher cyclohexene conversion of 90 % but failed to decompose the formed hydroperoxide due to their lower redox potential.…”
Section: With Roomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This assumption can also be supported by several studies on Cocontaining oxide nanocatalysts by Peng and coworkers, [10a,19,20,26] in which Co 3 + species were found to be the active sites for O 2 activation, [26] whereas Co 2 + cations were essential for the catalytic decomposition of 2-cyclohexene-1-hydroperoxide. [9] These Co-based catalysts enabled moderate to high cyclohexene conversions between 62 and 79 % with moderate product selectivities of 27 to 47 % to the main product 2cyclohexene-1-one (Figure 1, green columns) and leaching of the active Co species was excluded by ICP-MS measurements identifying the reaction to occur heterogeneously. [9] On the contrary, CuO nanoparticles provided a much higher cyclohexene conversion of 90 % but failed to decompose the formed hydroperoxide due to their lower redox potential.…”
Section: With Roomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] These Co-based catalysts enabled moderate to high cyclohexene conversions between 62 and 79 % with moderate product selectivities of 27 to 47 % to the main product 2cyclohexene-1-one (Figure 1, green columns) and leaching of the active Co species was excluded by ICP-MS measurements identifying the reaction to occur heterogeneously. [9] On the contrary, CuO nanoparticles provided a much higher cyclohexene conversion of 90 % but failed to decompose the formed hydroperoxide due to their lower redox potential. [18] Studies on the aerobic cyclohexene oxidation over MOFs only showed a low catalytic activity below 20 % (Figure 1, purple columns), which can also be assigned to the low availability of redox pairs.…”
Section: With Roomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations