Abstract:Autophagy has burgeoned rapidly as a field of study because of its evolutionary conservation, the diversity of intracellular cargoes degraded and recycled by this machinery the mechanisms involved, as well as its physiological relevance to human health and disease. This self-eating process was initially viewed as a non-selective mechanism used by eukaryotic cells to degrade and recycle macromolecules in response to stress; we now know that various cellular constituents, as well as pathogens, can also undergo s… Show more
“…Similarly, a typical inducer of bulk autophagy in yeast cells, nitrogen starvation, stimulates preferential degradation of the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase ALd6P, whose enzymatic activity would otherwise reduce cell viability under such conditions (Onodera & Ohsumi, 2004). A growing number of discovered receptors/adaptors for selective autophagy points to the complexity of autophagy selectivity, which originally might have been viewed as lacking selectivity (Dengjel et al, 2012;Mancias et al, 2014;Farre & Subramani, 2016), and also indicates that selectivity of autophagy is most probably determined at the cargo recruitment stage.…”
Section: Sharing Tasks: the Ups-autophagy Interfacementioning
Contents
958I.958II.959III.960IV.962V.962962References963
Summary
Proteases can either digest target proteins or perform the so‐called ‘limited proteolysis’ by cleaving polypeptide chains at specific site(s). Autophagy and the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) are two main mechanisms carrying out digestive proteolysis. While the net outcome of digestive proteolysis is the loss of function of protein substrates, limited proteolysis can additionally lead to gain or switch of function. Recent evidence of crosstalk between autophagy, UPS and limited proteolysis indicates that these pathways are parts of the same proteolytic nexus. Here, we focus on three emerging themes within this area: limited proteolysis as a mechanism modulating autophagy; interplay between autophagy and UPS, including autophagic degradation of proteasomes (proteophagy); and specificity of protein degradation during bulk autophagy.
“…Similarly, a typical inducer of bulk autophagy in yeast cells, nitrogen starvation, stimulates preferential degradation of the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase ALd6P, whose enzymatic activity would otherwise reduce cell viability under such conditions (Onodera & Ohsumi, 2004). A growing number of discovered receptors/adaptors for selective autophagy points to the complexity of autophagy selectivity, which originally might have been viewed as lacking selectivity (Dengjel et al, 2012;Mancias et al, 2014;Farre & Subramani, 2016), and also indicates that selectivity of autophagy is most probably determined at the cargo recruitment stage.…”
Section: Sharing Tasks: the Ups-autophagy Interfacementioning
Contents
958I.958II.959III.960IV.962V.962962References963
Summary
Proteases can either digest target proteins or perform the so‐called ‘limited proteolysis’ by cleaving polypeptide chains at specific site(s). Autophagy and the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) are two main mechanisms carrying out digestive proteolysis. While the net outcome of digestive proteolysis is the loss of function of protein substrates, limited proteolysis can additionally lead to gain or switch of function. Recent evidence of crosstalk between autophagy, UPS and limited proteolysis indicates that these pathways are parts of the same proteolytic nexus. Here, we focus on three emerging themes within this area: limited proteolysis as a mechanism modulating autophagy; interplay between autophagy and UPS, including autophagic degradation of proteasomes (proteophagy); and specificity of protein degradation during bulk autophagy.
“…15 A number of other forms of selective autophagy have been described including degradation of ribosomes (ribophagy), peroxisomes (pexophagy), mitochondria (mitophagy), and ER (reticulophagy). 23 However, the molecular mechanisms that regulate many of these processes have not been well characterized for mammalian cells and, thus, have not been investigated during viral infection.…”
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is exploited by several diverse viruses during their infectious life cycles. Flaviviruses, including dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV), utilize the ER as a source of membranes to establish their replication organelles and to facilitate their assembly and eventual maturation along the secretory pathway. To maintain normal homeostasis, host cells have evolved highly efficient processes to dynamically regulate the ER, such as through reticulophagy, a selective form of autophagy that leads to ER degradation. Here, we identify the ER-localized reticulophagy receptor FAM134B as a host cell restriction factor for both DENV and ZIKV. We show that RNAi-mediated depletion of FAM134B significantly enhances both DENV and ZIKV replication at an early stage of the viral life cycle. Consistent with its role as an antiviral host factor, we found that several flaviviruses including DENV, ZIKV, and West Nile virus (WNV), utilize their NS3 virally-encoded proteases to directly cleave FAM134B at a single site within its reticulon homology domain (RHD). Mechanistically, we show that NS3-mediated cleavage of FAM134B blocks the formation of ER and viral protein-enriched autophagosomes, suggesting that the cleavage of FAM134B serves to specifically suppress the reticulophagy pathway. These findings thus point to an important role for FAM134B and reticulophagy in the regulation of flavivirus infection and suggest that these viruses specifically target these pathways to promote viral replication.
“…In particular, of the ATG transcripts that were examined in this study, dhh1Δ cells demonstrated significantly increased levels of ATG3, 7,8,19,20,22 and 24 mRNA under nutrient-replete conditions (96). In the dcp2-7Δ ts strain, transcript levels for ATG1 through ATG9, ATG11, ATG13 through ATG24, ATG29, 31, 32 and 34 were significantly upregulated in rich conditions (96).…”
Section: Dcp2 and Rck Family Rna Helicases Dhh1/vad1/ddx6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least in yeast, the receptors utilized to target cargos are unique to the form of selective autophagy that the cell is undergoing (5,7,8,21). For further discussion on the topic of selective autophagy, see refs, (22,23).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATG3, 7,8,19,20,22,11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]29,31,32,34 TORC1 ATG1, 4,5,7,8,12,14,16,29,31 X r n 1 …”
Autophagy is a highly conserved catabolic pathway that is vital for development, cell survival and the degradation of dysfunctional organelles and potentially toxic aggregates. Dysregulation of autophagy is associated with cancer, neurodegeneration and lysosomal storage diseases. Accordingly, autophagy is precisely regulated at multiple levels (transcriptional, post-transcriptional, translational and post-translational) to prevent aberrant activity. Various model organisms are used to study autophagy but the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae continues to be advantageous for genetic and biochemical analysis of non-selective and selective autophagy. In this review, we focus on the cellular mechanisms that regulate autophagy transcriptionally and post-transcriptionally in S. cerevisiae.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.