A computational study with the M06/B3LYP density functional is carried out to explore the effects of additives C5H5NO vs. PhNO on the gold‐catalyzed dehydrogenative heterocyclization of 2‐(1‐alkynyl)‐2‐alken‐1‐ones to form 2,3‐furan‐fused carbocycles. The following three conclusions are obtained based on our theoretical calculations. (a) The Au(I) catalyst plays a crucial role on the intramolecular cyclization reaction. (b) Both additives C5H5NO and PhNO as the proton shuttle can assist proton‐transfer through a two‐step proton‐transfer mechanism including the protonation of additive and the deprotonation of additive‐H+, whereas the catalytic capability of PhNO is weaker than that of C5H5NO (energy barrier: 90.6 vs. 33.2 kJ/mol). (c) C5H5NO‐H+ has stronger stability comparing with PhNO‐H+ because the basicity of C5H5NO is stronger than that of PhNO, which cause that the energy barrier of ts3 + PhNO‐H+ (131.5 kJ/mol) is higher than that of ts3 + C5H5NO‐H+ (60.5 kJ/mol) in the intermolecular addition. Therefore, the base strength is the primary factor that controls the catalytic capability of additives C5H5NO vs. PhNO. These studies are expected to improve our understanding of Au(I)‐catalyzed reactions involving additive as the cocatalyst and to provide guidance for the future design of new catalysts and new reactions.