2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0728(00)00091-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic investigation of xanthene oxidation by heterogeneous and homogeneous electron transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of homogeneous redox catalysis to a-phellandrene and c-terpinene oxidation allowed the determination of the corresponding cation radical deprotonation rates. The values obtained are in the same range as those determined in previous studies [18,19]. Nevertheless, we notice that the deprotonation rate constant of c-terpinene cation radical has a slightly higher value due to more localization of the positive charge in this intermediate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Application of homogeneous redox catalysis to a-phellandrene and c-terpinene oxidation allowed the determination of the corresponding cation radical deprotonation rates. The values obtained are in the same range as those determined in previous studies [18,19]. Nevertheless, we notice that the deprotonation rate constant of c-terpinene cation radical has a slightly higher value due to more localization of the positive charge in this intermediate.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, as an alternative, the reaction could proceed through a hydride‐transfer step from the dihydroheteroanthracenes to chloranil, followed by conjugate addition of the sulfonamide to the cationic heteroanthracenium derivative. The two‐electron oxidation and deprotonation of xanthene, thioxanthene and N ‐methyldihydroacridine has previously been studied by electrochemical or combined radiolytic and photochemical oxidation and hydride transfer to triphenylmethyl perchlorate (Scheme a,b) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the anodic scan over a potential range 0.0 to 2.5 V (or 3.0 V), 1a (0.01 ), pyrrolidine (0.01 ), and 2a (0.01 ) showed an oxidation peak at 2.7, 1.4, and 2.0 V, respectively versus a silver-wire pseudoreference electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 Vs -1 (Figure 1, a). [4,9] An oxidation peak for a mixture of compound 1a (0.01 ) and pyrrolidine (0.005 ) was observed at 0.8 V, which was confirmed to be the oxidation peak potential corresponding to the enamine formed from 1a and pyrrolidine (Figure 1, b). [4] In the cyclic voltammetry of a mixture of 1a (0.01 ), pyrrolidine (0.005 ), and 2a (0.02 ), three oxidation waves appeared at E p,a = 0.8, 2.3, and 2.9 V, respectively, which corresponded to the oxidation of in situ formed enamines 1b and 1a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%