2005
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.104.080457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of CHF3381 (2-[(2,3-Dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)amino]acetamide Monohydrochloride), a Novel N-Methyl-d-aspartate Antagonist and Monoamine Oxidase-A Inhibitor in Healthy Subjects

Abstract: CHF3381 (2-[(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)amino]acetamide monohydrochloride) is a new N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist and reversible monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) inhibitor in develop-ment for the treatment of neuropathic pain. This study developed a mechanistic model to describe the pharmacokinetics of CHF3381 and of its two metabolites, the relationship with MAO-A activity and heart rate. Doses of 100, 200, and 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks were administered orally to 36 subjects. MAO-A activity was estimated by… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that atomoxetine had the highest dose of the 3 drugs and achieved higher plasma drug concentrations than duloxetine or edivoxetine (see Figure 1), but elicited an effect on plasma DHPG similar to edivoxetine and duloxetine (see Figure 2). The plasma DHPG baseline in this study was similar to that observed in a study using MOA-A inhibitors 28,29 ; however, the maximal plasma DHPG inhibition with monoamine oxidase-A inhibitors was greater (80%) than what we determined for NET inhibitors (33% to 37%). The K out parameter reflects the elimination rate constant for plasma DHPG, and was not expected to be affected by the selection of drug.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that atomoxetine had the highest dose of the 3 drugs and achieved higher plasma drug concentrations than duloxetine or edivoxetine (see Figure 1), but elicited an effect on plasma DHPG similar to edivoxetine and duloxetine (see Figure 2). The plasma DHPG baseline in this study was similar to that observed in a study using MOA-A inhibitors 28,29 ; however, the maximal plasma DHPG inhibition with monoamine oxidase-A inhibitors was greater (80%) than what we determined for NET inhibitors (33% to 37%). The K out parameter reflects the elimination rate constant for plasma DHPG, and was not expected to be affected by the selection of drug.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The time course of reduction in plasma and CSF DHPG concentrations was characterized using an indirect response model with inhibition of the production of DHPG (K in ) based on the mechanism of action of NET inhibitors; that is, inhibition of NE reuptake, leading to less intraneuronal metabolism of NE to DHPG, which is reflected in decreases in plasma and CSF DHPG concentrations. The delay in response relative to plasma drug concentration was consistent with the observed anticlockwise hysteresis reported for plasma DHPG in the presence of monoamine oxidase A inhibitors . To note, plasma and CSF NE data were collected across the 3 drugs, but our analysis indicated that DHPG provided a less variable response than NE (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Treatment with drugs that inhibit MAO‐A has previously been demonstrated to reduce the plasma concentration of DHPG 24 , 25 , 28 30 produced after oxidation of noradrenalin by MAO‐A 31 . Therefore, the plasma level of DHPG was used as an indirect marker of MAO‐A activity (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of plasma concentration of dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), a deaminated metabolite of norepinephrine, was used as a crude marker of MAO‐A activity 24 , 25 . For determination of plasma DHPG, 5‐mL blood samples were collected on day 1, before and 2 hours after tyramine administration, and on day 24 (day 40 for group 4b) 0.5 hours after study drug administration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%