Dimeric aminoboranes,
[H
2
BNR
2
]
2
(R = Me or CH
2
CH
2
) containing B
2
N
2
cores, can
be activated by I
2
, HNTf
2
(NTf
2
=
[N(SO
2
CF
3
)
2
]), or [Ph
3
C][B(C
6
F
5
)
4
] to form isolable H
2
B(μ-NR
2
)
2
BHX (for X = I or NTf
2
). For X = [B(C
6
F
5
)
4
]
−
further reactivity, presumably
between [H
2
B(μ-NMe
2
)
2
BH][B(C
6
F
5
)
4
] and aminoborane, forms a B
3
N
3
-based monocation containing a three-center two
electron B-(μ-H)-B moiety. The structures of H
2
B(μ-NMe
2
)
2
BH(I) and [(μ-NMe
2
)BH(NTf
2
)]
2
indicated a sterically crowded environment
around boron, and this leads to the less common O-bound mode of NTf
2
binding. While the iodide congener reacted very slowly with
alkynes, the NTf
2
analogues were more reactive, with hydroboration
of internal alkynes forming (vinyl)
2
BNR
2
species
and R
2
NBH(NTf
2
) as the major products. Further
studies indicated that the B
2
N
2
core is maintained
during the first hydroboration, and that it is during subsequent steps
that B
2
N
2
dissociation occurs. In the mono-boron
systems, for example,
i
Pr
2
NBH(NTf
2
), NTf
2
is N-bound; thus, they have less steric
crowding around boron relative to the B
2
N
2
systems.
Notably, the monoboron systems are much less reactive in alkyne hydroboration
than the B
2
N
2
-based bis-boranes, despite the
former being three coordinate at boron while the latter are four coordinate
at boron. Finally, these B
2
N
2
electrophiles
are much more prone to dissociate into mono-borane species than pyrazabole
[H
2
B(μ-N
2
C
3
H
3
)]
2
analogues, making them less useful for the dir...