2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.5b00317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanistic Understanding of the Aryl-Dependent Ring Formations in Rh(III)-Catalyzed C–H Activation/Cycloaddition of Benzamides and Methylenecyclopropanes by DFT Calculations

Abstract: The divergence between Rh(III)-catalyzed C− H activation/cycloaddition of phenyl-and 2-furanyl-containing benzamides with methylenecyclopropanes (MCP) was studied by DFT calculations. Calculations found that the C−H activation via a CMD mechanism is the most difficult step of the reaction involving phenyl. In contrast, the C−H activation of the 2-furanyl-containing substrate is kinetically easier but the formed five-membered rhodacycle is relatively unstable, making the following MCP insertion more difficult. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 188 publications
5
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The length of the Rh–H 1 (Rh–H 1 = 2.26 Å) bond in TS M2 – 3 indicates that the Rh atom mediates the C–H activation. Similar acetate‐assisted C–H activations through CMD processes have been reported by Xia,[23e], [28b], Fu,[29c] Zhao,[28a] Bi,[24b] You, Macgregor, and Wang et al, and their calculated energy barriers are 8–22 kcal/mol. The large differences in the energy barriers can be ascribed partly to the electron‐deficient CF 3 substituent on the Cp* ligand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The length of the Rh–H 1 (Rh–H 1 = 2.26 Å) bond in TS M2 – 3 indicates that the Rh atom mediates the C–H activation. Similar acetate‐assisted C–H activations through CMD processes have been reported by Xia,[23e], [28b], Fu,[29c] Zhao,[28a] Bi,[24b] You, Macgregor, and Wang et al, and their calculated energy barriers are 8–22 kcal/mol. The large differences in the energy barriers can be ascribed partly to the electron‐deficient CF 3 substituent on the Cp* ligand.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As shown in Figure a, for M1 ‐CH 3 , ligand‐assisted C–H activation via TS M26 – 27 (Rh–C 1 = 2.20 Å, Rh–H 1 = 2.28 Å, C 1 –H 1 = 1.32 Å, and O 4 –H 1 = 1.32 Å; see Figure ) requires an energy of 14.3 kcal/mol, which is larger than that (4.8 kcal/mol) for M1 ‐CF 3 . The value of 14.3 kcal/mol is in the range reported for similar processes in other Rh III ‐catalyzed reactions , , , . In contrast to the process for M1 ‐CF 3 , which is exergonic by 7.6 kcal/mol, that for M1 ‐CH 3 is endergonic by 3.1 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Aufgrund der Gegenwart des Furanrings scheint eine Cyclopropylcarbinyl‐Butenyl‐Umlagerung gegenüber der alternativen reduktiven Eliminierung bevorzugt, wobei sich ein intermediärer achtgliedriger Metallacyclus bildet. Der abschließende C‐N‐Bindungsbildungsschritt führt bei Spaltung der N‐O‐Bindung zu den Cycloheptanprodukten …”
Section: Anellierungen Durch C‐h‐aktivierung Migratorische Insertiounclassified