2016
DOI: 10.3366/ijhac.2016.0163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanized Margin to Digitized Center: Black Feminism's Contributions to Combatting Erasure within the Digital Humanities

Abstract: Computational analysis and digital humanities are far from neutral processes and sites unimpeded by the political, social and economic context in which they emerged and are utilized. As an interdisciplinary field, the digital humanities have transformed the relationship of humans to computers broadly conceived. At the same time, the methods, theories, perspectives and the concomitant digital tools developed are being criticized for reproducing the social divisions that exist in society. The effort to recover B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This project acknowledges my own insight and experiences as a legitimate source of knowledge and relies upon an informal data source to create knowledge in which I am heavily invested (See Brown et al, 2016 for an explanation of how corpora can be interpreted as sociopolitical entities and how the incorporation of informal sources of data into analysis can reduce some forms of disciplinary bias.) The use of social media, specifically Facebook, to create a corpus of study and analysis allows for the exploration of the social self specifically for the purposes of engaging in identity work and explicitly in service to Black feminism.…”
Section: The Digital Is Political: On Knowledge Legitimacy Bias Anmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This project acknowledges my own insight and experiences as a legitimate source of knowledge and relies upon an informal data source to create knowledge in which I am heavily invested (See Brown et al, 2016 for an explanation of how corpora can be interpreted as sociopolitical entities and how the incorporation of informal sources of data into analysis can reduce some forms of disciplinary bias.) The use of social media, specifically Facebook, to create a corpus of study and analysis allows for the exploration of the social self specifically for the purposes of engaging in identity work and explicitly in service to Black feminism.…”
Section: The Digital Is Political: On Knowledge Legitimacy Bias Anmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is precisely what autoethnography brings to computational interpretation and analysis. (Brown, Mendenhall, Black, Van Moer, Lourentzou, Zeria, Flynn, 2016) in conjunction with the distant reading of the topic modeling output provided by the computation. With intermediate reading, topics emerging from computational modeling are traced back to Facebook posts that comprise the topics.…”
Section: Resisting the Desire To Privilege One Methods Over Anothermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gathering our Indigenous ancestral knowledge using data mining techniques, we strengthen our communities and embrace our epistemologies. Brown et al (2016) examined Black women's contribution to knowledge creation in digital humanities by using TDM to analyze 800,000 publicly available documents. Similarly, healing researchers could examine historical documents, social media, film/videos and newspaper articles globally using key words and topical analyses to determine and understand global epistemologies.…”
Section: Petal Six: Healing Research Promotes Community Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the most part, digital repositories replicate and even exacerbate disparities in record accessibility globally. Computational analyses of digital repositories in general suggest these continue to reflect the systemic biases of most record collections in offering limited records by or about minorities-or at least not making such records readily findable-impeding efforts to study the experiences of these groups (Brown et al 2016). The role of commercial genealogical providers compounds this issue because they cater for relatively well-off communities of family historians, ensuring that 'the new digital form of the sources…remain Western-centric' (Hitchcock 2017, p. 338).…”
Section: Challenges For Digital Public Histories Of Crimementioning
confidence: 99%