2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23208436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechatronic Pole System for Monitoring the Correctness of Nordic Walking

Sławomir Wudarczyk,
Marek Woźniewski,
Agnieszka Szpala
et al.

Abstract: Marching with Nordic walking (NW) poles is a common form of physical activity. It is recommended in the treatment and rehabilitation of many diseases. NW’s wide range of applications in rehabilitation and its effectiveness are limited by the need for experienced physiotherapists to supervise patients during the training. A prerequisite for good rehabilitation results is correctly using the poles during walking. Essential parameters of NW include the angle of inclination of the pole, the force of the pole on th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the pole also featured distance sensors, two optical and two ultrasonic, and one sensor of each type at the foot and handle. The conducted signal tests from the inertial, pressure, contact, and distance sensors confirmed sufficient accuracy for the study of gait biomechanics [20,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the pole also featured distance sensors, two optical and two ultrasonic, and one sensor of each type at the foot and handle. The conducted signal tests from the inertial, pressure, contact, and distance sensors confirmed sufficient accuracy for the study of gait biomechanics [20,21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The design of the mechatronic poles has been described in our previous studies [20,21]. In short: the classic NW poles have two nine-axis inertial sensors (a three-axis gyroscope, an accelerometer, and a magnetometer).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in mass between classic and mechatronic sticks was 100 g, without changing the position of the center of gravity. It was possible to adjust the length of the mechatronic stick, which was adapted to the participant's body height, so that in a standing position, the person holding the stick perpendicular to the ground had the elbow joint bent at an angle of 90 degrees and the forearm parallel to the ground 31 . www.nature.com/scientificreports/…”
Section: Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%