2018
DOI: 10.1115/1.2018-sep6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechatronics for Humanitarian Explosive Ordnance Disposal in Cambodia

Garrett M. Clayton

Abstract: Over the past six years, researchers at Villanova University (VU) and the Golden West Humanitarian Foundation (GWHF) have developed an integrated research and educational program focused on the use of mechatronics and robotics in humanitarian explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) and mine action. In the following article, I will talk about this program, discuss two ongoing projects - a low-cost EOD robot and an automated ordnance identification system - and talk about how we have successfully integrated students i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shared trajectory tracking controller with collision avoidance (49) is the result of the combination of the Lyapunov-based trajectory tracking controller (15), the human control input (38), and the collision avoidance controller (33), thus the stability analysis of the closed-loop human-robot shared control system (6) can be divided into: 1) the stability of the closed-loop system (6) when we apply only the Lyapunov-based trajectory tracking controller (15); 2) the stability of ( 6) when we apply only human control input (38); 3) the stability of ( 6) when we combined ( 15) and ( 38); and 4) the forward invariant of the safe graph space (19). The closed loop system ( 6) is asymptotically stable when we apply only the Lyapunov-based trajectory tracking controller ( 15) is asymptotically stable according to [60,Section 5.4].…”
Section: D1 Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The shared trajectory tracking controller with collision avoidance (49) is the result of the combination of the Lyapunov-based trajectory tracking controller (15), the human control input (38), and the collision avoidance controller (33), thus the stability analysis of the closed-loop human-robot shared control system (6) can be divided into: 1) the stability of the closed-loop system (6) when we apply only the Lyapunov-based trajectory tracking controller (15); 2) the stability of ( 6) when we apply only human control input (38); 3) the stability of ( 6) when we combined ( 15) and ( 38); and 4) the forward invariant of the safe graph space (19). The closed loop system ( 6) is asymptotically stable when we apply only the Lyapunov-based trajectory tracking controller ( 15) is asymptotically stable according to [60,Section 5.4].…”
Section: D1 Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prove the stability of the closed-loop system (6) when ( 15) and ( 38) are combined, we need to prove that the shared controller (34) is bounded. Using the results of [21], if (15) is bounded, and ( 38) is bounded, then ( 34) is also bounded. The boundedness of ( 38) is ensured by assuming that the speed of the moving obstacles is bounded.…”
Section: D1 Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a successful operation there must be trust between the operator and the robotic partner, the cobots are designed with the purpose that the robot can support the various tasks of the operator, for them the human-robot interaction (HRI) is paramount. HRI covers the various fields such as design, understanding and evaluation of robotic systems, which involve humans and robots interacting through communication [3], [4]. The trust with a cobot can decrease drastically if it provides constant wrong information in risky situations, therefore a good robotic system that increases the trust with cobots is necessary [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using finite element analysis, you can describe the temperature rise of each part of the motor accurately. However, this method is very cumbersome to model and cannot be entirely suitable for the variable motor load on the robot, and the lumped analysis method is too simplified and not suitable for the actual life estimation of the motor [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%